X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=Suj/19
	k8zN7yEEqwoPqtD6vuNrBBjn8LY2RsoamhXQ7cyJaPV2m05UvMKllHWZyKWbo3Yf
	m0i1Y5t272HWHrdpgES156ytI4p4uwftj1+Fi1wIFAS1Tt/SlfNfC92Rm3apM9xn
	rUQLd+slMTOb+gItyxCweAEUkkA94aaYHEDzI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=cRU1fzouyXjb
	HTg6Two4fpIQEU0=; b=ZMtVEEga4ydc7gH8a0q29AxoW0eBuSYppIBK3wz1db/a
	ce9XJy4/R1VSoeerO6FLZdN9ZNPuKcX4/2ehDY96g/2LPQ9n8wCmvJcEvxGmH4HL
	3XTGA7sHEu4yqFEBuV/e585QC7A78MlXjQYJRUir66L7Hs4ED8Lx1jIjJgiikW4=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-pd0-f172.google.com
X-Received: by 10.70.5.3 with SMTP id o3mr116593644pdo.17.1426346094687;        Sat, 14 Mar 2015 08:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5504505F.7050009@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 23:14:39 +0800
From: JonY <10walls AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20140503 FossaMail/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: g++4.9.2 fails to compile standard C++11 code
References: <CAJ+GnyeViXtbQ6S=tC6z8XVZgOcoHv6Gi0ww8W1HEG_XKJrhUw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150312095559 DOT GA2644 AT dimstar DOT local DOT net> <CAEhDDbDrfTgUrxOdk3h2T=zn3Edng12vtnrb5csAS7fRYM9PMQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150313094647 DOT GB20626 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <55034F93 DOT 10800 AT t-online DOT de>
In-Reply-To: <55034F93.10800@t-online.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XTR8hqBqMxI5mm8luMoFTewneQBiS6k7O"
X-IsSubscribed: yes

--XTR8hqBqMxI5mm8luMoFTewneQBiS6k7O
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 3/14/2015 04:58, Christian Franke wrote:
>=20
> Yes. The attached patch for cmath include file would fix this.
>=20
> Christian
>=20

Hi,

I think newlib should be updated instead. Patching a libstdc++ header is
something I'd want to avoid.




--XTR8hqBqMxI5mm8luMoFTewneQBiS6k7O
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVBFBkAAoJEHE7X+KcFF1FFBAP/RDrwMZMdKk8l7T8hnpK0eNP
AS0A7UwzTeGG0UZlhehcthMJZ6nka/wGwXw7z3efeYQVWZHyq7DpNAQSc1O6fYWq
zQ9mS//Izy/gN6N0rwOKIPSa7u+9SCOBTHUqpSutRbli2liFB2rc99rPjnxl+Xht
4/H6A0I4vlOYfGuvyUXu7SaLoAd0KiDMSM/gyBnOyjOqx6kzd7T9LkxTuMJVbsCt
hXrJRzQCKKKXNmTT5WRAtrAMgOXLA+cW6v3umwCyrN39x2+dEgdbJcSHe9KEZLO5
RmV1DuORKfLNa/ysLYFMLJJtLsqUhq1Pw6gjGk+Q7Cw/Lop9DAQ1fPaMvVHrfIVT
Ks3spuKJKOCIalVJghr7sJiBtRARHEhyl9tsFIxp/0nW/OlggT7CjyCodV7EjinS
ytE3aYLN6FsWOgPEzXq7gDR5hsqI/9//sq7WFmuyxHvmkTfLxnyhY4FCnOEuKlaT
5AEN4Flo1aoWuOK9iWZfgromE5UpX17wrDE7co+G18D+w1KMpUluZcuSKImTW1nb
WPuZz7cj/+JRxRPy6vYH3e+O811YmhnJHHgPZWFlEvRox5gM8/UNINUJrt0Wk4ge
aectNJEjehqWaS3aB8MXrZno0avrnhnWMv3K39VqX2Ql8qAnaNWO+v4uXlT3ZWjI
p5OmvlmkybjyID/dyMh1
=IFKc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--XTR8hqBqMxI5mm8luMoFTewneQBiS6k7O--