X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:message-id:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:subject :references; q=dns; s=default; b=YLzse0O5fVJQtyCc6F77cnNQ2i6xKEo zCMu3V4dqPxqj8+ywbkzWNeWIsOphwyqORWrp+Pj9OquTxZURWuEmqxBnD6m1jA3 r0JJ8f0uu9ewtHMWeTrItociSdMDvImdHuAXsqRyBJAGgMNJXXFxn+pueyze8Ebk m/mjqOWWLxNQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:message-id:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:subject :references; s=default; bh=vUOAfvj82uMxKFuASVq12QeBbKs=; b=TqEUI wLfAKCHIlRIkGMKSmpaxR6m5+am//pmC6XLlh54Bw6/Mo2VIj1yKmWq/2vf7uWth GXAy6Hk/Xx1VxdYV09BHxSkr/EJN/hTJ+YGyMfYSaVNwjZ0UA5eEHSTZtCCKe93Z aZZnkdXn6lMhioy+zoQY31Lx77/Fyaww1FO2kg= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:30:21 -0400 Message-Id: <201503101830.t2AIUL5U014253@greed.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: Corinna Vinschen CC: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, binutils AT sourceware DOT org, gdb AT sourceware DOT org, gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org In-reply-to: <20150310181952.GL5732@calimero.vinschen.de> (message from Corinna Vinschen on Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:19:52 +0100) Subject: Re: Newlib/Cygwin now under GIT References: <20150305145541 DOT GA20560 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150310153846 DOT GI5732 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20150310181952 DOT GL5732 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> > This is a common problem. I guess newlib/cygwin got the oldest set > and, afaik, the GCC toplevel stuff is kind of the master. It would > be nice if we had some automatism in place to keep all former src > repos in sync. There was never any agreement on who the "master" was for toplevel sources - no repo was willing to give up control to the other, so no automatic mirroring was ever done, unlike the libiberty/include mirror, where src agreed to let gcc be the master. Also, for the record, I do not wish to, nor do I intend to, provide any automated merging services for git repos. I don't like git and I'd rather not use it if I don't have to. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple