X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=sApbW QieuEpSeEiUEPwRWAhzmwbXSdhTU49UhohyU5Vx/coyZmI+4UDyQveZpijJCBc4R P4n/fx/qNS6Xy0i8sDPX2mn8FF6uA39znPZDMQEIGn/MSvko6k261tUeMzZKSF6v b6x7CTeFUGdFhRwqrfJmzyY3t9MtVltRCMxQUo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=N8iJB+2V6X8 YH2JL67H2l85jYtk=; b=pHJ0O3rdETIQwikZ6V2NYxErjf9dtRZjYAgcwli4yQA 8PpYrE3xwKhNy1NtM/ESONbweMIVe9VeUBKIu8okTYAFII0QkVUHkHvRmBysWRlI 4wVy7DExD+MJdNP9kTArlK0XHOySd7Bx/CBeRz/2jLfeziGNtJORnzR0LFH37JbQ = Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-in-10.arcor-online.net X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-16.arcor-online.net 3l16l56ptwzDnk From: Achim Gratz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: Cygwin 1.7.35-1 References: <20150309091029 DOT GA28200 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 18:59:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20150309091029.GA28200@calimero.vinschen.de> (Corinna Vinschen's message of "Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:10:29 +0100") Message-ID: <87ioeam4q8.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Corinna Vinschen writes: > The problem is this. How long do you want `ls -l' take? Checking > permissions is awkward and lengthy on Windows, unless you have the > user's token. The only token that's relevant for the ACL mapping w.r.t. POSIX semantics is that of the current user and Cygwin should already have that I think. Plus the extra work only needs to be done when the file is owned by that user and/or the egid is identical to the group of said file. In all other cases the normal ACL processing should actually yield the same result as mandated by POSIX. > The access check can be improved and the permissions more correctly > shown for the current user, but for any file and any user account, > it'd be a lot of time-consuming effort. I'd say that Cygwin already does all of that, except for this special handling of the file owner and group. It already has to check who the owner and group is, so that information is also there. I'm not sure how much more work it is to graft the permissions. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptation for Waldorf microQ V2.22R2: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple