X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=l4V1fc1Tde+/HG2T UsnfNZhZNShfsYB0CHVdDVIdkqj2AhHhhv8rAcspC30K7+RdLy3U7HJSQhZC4XYI yAeAzETy3U56+76z7FJIVccbsMPnDJrWYhBVTHAkI1ceuC5UrLj8k4Pd+3+0WNDZ qlebcxBDjuA7WKbt3/Lj2NE2Wco= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Vnhu5iXgClYZuVyv3O1hQG lKapY=; b=RMzwoE59PdliIys8d0xvFL+FuueDHor+7+6YEVfmtPPww2nDunSEG2 mx0WZ+vG9UXccjx2h7iYSz1BJOT0YuD4Y8ZHQTqdKR3PmcXJDyOhG955+WmKkrUE Z5d/Tqw5+MXs/pZQpaTKzlOT9chcrGT2KIpVPiSR/R0kXichA1rME= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_BODY_URIBL_PCCC,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,KAM_THEBAT,RCVD_IN_PSBL,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.ht-systems.ru Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 06:02:01 +0300 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <578953828.20150306060201@yandex.ru> To: Will Parsons , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: discrepancy btw. Cygwin 32 & 64 wrt file permissions In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Greetings, Will Parsons! > I've been using Cygwin for some time now, but recently decided to try > a parallel installation of Cygwin 64 on the same machine. I've > noticed a strange discrepancy between how Cygwin 32 & 64 report file > permissions: > (32-bit) > % uname -a > CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW sothis 1.7.35(0.287/5/3) 2015-03-04 12:07 i686 Cygwin > % touch x > % chmod a-w x > % ls -l x > -r--r--r-- 1 william None 0 Mar 5 17:41 x > % ls -ln x > -r--r--r-- 1 197608 197121 0 Mar 5 17:41 x > (64-bits) > % uname -a > CYGWIN_NT-6.1 sothis 1.7.35(0.287/5/3) 2015-03-04 12:09 x86_64 Cygwin > % ls -l x > -rw-r--r-- 1 william None 0 Mar 5 17:41 x > % ls -ln x > -rw-r--r-- 1 197608 197121 0 Mar 5 17:41 x > Why does 64-bit Cygwin have a different idea of whether the file is > writable? Because they get different mount options? That would've been my first guess. I could be wrong, though. Either way, Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru) 06.03.2015, <06:00> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple