X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject :from:to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q= dns; s=default; b=SdICJdkacxsawxaMU4r0v8U6GxaVqG9YbKTCJmd48wWSIw 2eVJJqLock7O7zmPqFrjqJUOhZjoU3Qms+2BlgYIBL0Gpn0CtA5KCFIMMvY7dHj2 XiNiG8tvX45GrtrkEPH9iEKQM/i+vCaPZQ2kyTTK+MzCoDCH6VY0V0415Wk/Y= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject :from:to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= default; bh=oFYyoFt4W4puPCdSZayMYo580cg=; b=RD24giNbB4jWr4UEGNdi 2CsuMTwPV1SOrWBILv/PRCxGXm0/GiWsWMFtzl9vqXCitXX4e165UVuQptl5zIzw x/SyEKeATvzyq7Tk2SXj6ksJWS3pUXLQw8bUig6blRCPyU9vn1osdFLi0xLZE5ch cX9XSBel0artVia0ozp5diw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: lb1-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20150304182232.GN3213@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <9d0083cc54bdc7ef8fe30df584810501 DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT xs4all DOT nl> <20150304182232 DOT GN3213 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:25:28 +0100 Subject: Re: Using FIFO's in Cygwin. From: "Houder" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes >> Q: is the model of the FIFO in Cygwin different from the one used in Linux? Note: the question is about >> the model for FIFO's in blocking mode ... >> >> Non-blocking complicates things even more ... > > FIFOs in Cygwin are using Windows named pipes, and the implementation > was never really complete and never really worked as on Linux, > unfortunately. The FIFO stuff probably needs a really good kick and > maybe a solution not using those dreaded named pipes. Thank you for the confirmation! > I'll probably look into that again at one point, it's just that my > TODO list is getting too long already :} Yes, I am very much aware of that (I guess) ... do not put them on your list on my account (or else put them at the bottom of your list) ... as long as nobody else is complaining, why would you? As we all need rest now and then, there is a limit to what can be done by each of us (otherwise we will fail in trying doing too much). Henri -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple