X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=Cihx5XWcFytcERrw0SDfk1Z28W4cZUcZbGBtsNIUSCIwTjpt5CWFm 46ngUK9RaBbyDMxywPYoc0qADxMokCNxNErMe/nSx2H36hqd2s/yUe+MZRkHxsV9 jCNmUsNeJPeoZ9ZJIH1BWXWJcPMCg2cxDOivZSdjn5ajnhvBW2K07M= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=nomHV45U9B79gq+/ZwUuOMj7ie4=; b=ZRFW7Hk5v8ytpOG+WznP3OfTIgzJ rlCncwUpjrgPte0N0zqtK64iwMxBuu5rkW+npnyO4VzQCEMDp8S8ZGYIq94Nr1EU pwRah0yZiuhSwZL1E94LfB8Q2OWjS6QlsQ8pxsSgfgofrkJo8mtTtYFEKNMMhvxD ii0x73rHaATRmHs= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:13:48 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Too Many Permissions Stripped In 1.7.35? Message-ID: <20150302111348.GI3213@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <54F37C9F DOT 1020900 AT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="D6IIOQQv2Iwyp54J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54F37C9F.1020900@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) --D6IIOQQv2Iwyp54J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mar 1 12:54, random user wrote: > Thanks for the reply. Seems we've maybe miscommunicated a bit tho. > So not meaning to argue, just to try to clarify, let me try again: > [...] > I'm only wondering if showing the group mode as r-x in the last case > above is best, vs continuing to show the group as ---, the same as it > appeared before the chmod o+rwx. Either seems reasonably accurate > from p.o.v. of actual security since there can't be group members > other than the user itself so the group can't be carrying any actual > new permission for anyone. But chmod o+ having a visible > impact on the group bits seems surprising. I got your point. Please try the latest developer snapshot from https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ Thanks, Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --D6IIOQQv2Iwyp54J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJU9EXsAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gDhAP/3VvU9yJQWm86XYck2p7+zsl xeUP8lnAwggLrWxrIgPd2fh7pYVNGcP5BSQ6XvLq+VrPKqHX6uS48pp5gB07rPui YarRI9inLAZelK8NNqAefmSY4DvmrdujFoduHMI+vPsfJrgIC0HP12YiuPDzz5Ia +vpcifpaC+uWFHCwM8CFPI+8rhPmhnUy9v+Or8S6VUtXR0/XVVRqnz3w9WC/n7WN uB+jCQuKEZ6fe2Rhjo8eI+e63XF4hASLekEiEk0Mc8eloJ7AcseJWAk5tfSi4SIp fNpY15F/u91IVqMbMNSvEt2PwNiozcnzvLb2gEtfIKnNrfdyV4ydQPJ1shSjQJYe k2ytsFDOAAulajaXs/tjybCvpNP0j2sn8Lh++2Bn9kjPbLJdQevknmWNLhevabe4 l97VYkPp8XsLEhC9ojmHv1ODBvbQ+aoP37dMvdHyOEgombL7NhHFDqInc58WNJ0N kV9tUMNP3fqG2UxdYIvEdh/sfjAN7tPnhedXgyxKxvfzLWofLS8skPyae7wxPMTi NAFjVnd7yufWuUaTTlKzPgxeSl88OcYVkI138Bi+AyjE3JkPF7xOCkv2RBUzyR+y h+qYZbBhK3+mbwvYlbyq41ffyvZYshjdiyQgu2aRNROixOGv+jG9vLVR5wdOv3a/ 2qMXb87XapPP0pjKkhG8 =Syil -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --D6IIOQQv2Iwyp54J--