X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=N6DxctlNdvg0V/Aictk0R1cY5twL95q3iuNUEfhRwtH dQiM5xs0o3f/gY6Bbh/Tzabw4h40+ukzRjrIUrolZCqFTzVrizAGmLxgxT4rPZ3e fS4aJoOKbHHMEsOGeQ4zkwLprm7P0BKTR70Ysa98e7f19MGO3Rfdirgo7UdlX73c = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=l9LUktTE8iaIWVgpIO1E5mDGixk=; b=KBqNUllSNjP5dNqrc yXQJgAk2Cs/1Gsm3gabzPABeUzFL/3hdJHLWHxnn1FWqdbf+o5Sl3Ka/aUiroK6+ JSIwlsYfNUhs/6C8UF93FGnRhYoXbaQmx+trB1UOULayuwbRiUlf5rwuC174S2aP 1tW852+zpWUUZf9SI3T3kO57jg= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Message-ID: <1425221317.8604.3.camel@cygwin.com> Subject: Re: gnupg packaging bug? From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 08:48:37 -0600 In-Reply-To: <54F2F876.3060708@gmail.com> References: <54F22463 DOT 5080407 AT cornell DOT edu> <54F2E34E DOT 7080707 AT gmail DOT com> <20150301100939 DOT GA3213 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <54F2F876 DOT 3060708 AT gmail DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On Sun, 2015-03-01 at 12:31 +0100, Marco Atzeri wrote: > further checking I found that gnupg requires > libusb-config but this seems present only in the > > libusb-devel-1.2.6.0-2 - libusb-devel: USB library (deprecated 0.1 API) > (installed binaries and support files) > > and not in the new API version > libusb1.0-devel USB library > > So it seems that gnupg 1.4x is looking for the deprecated 0.1 API, > not sure it is really worth. Even on Fedora, there are still a number of packages which have yet to be ported to the 1.0 API, so don't let this stop you. -- Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple