X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=v3QRbXuIrmAI3YZt
	G+CbvwTmasirya89wcjlHzs7UVZoL99eRctG9ORKCLT0uqc573oN5Okld5I7IljG
	2UCtKNu9JrgqWGk+KJnRXZWXsj1+eoRSqypRSPlLr4Iy373G764mcE8ZTgLdY/Hv
	nhTTTM2ZpnIKck0DDtEUgF69NvY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=R2Nz20Mr4hx2KA/1QQ9Jj0
	UsCIE=; b=ETPAJKCB9Mx0NyflC5cq5tAnkr7UY7WUtMR65Tize5eIgAeLzmYsrV
	9KP7x+qV0a9l+OeuAMyPJ+UX1IOqTmRCYVKVb92/5FQPyJ1bEScADE21dSGX3nd+
	F20Tk4l0126sqPIloo/DjOuMsNyzjUxWVzv4voN4Lb66dogSa30dU=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_BODY_URIBL_PCCC,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: smtp.ht-systems.ru
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:54:27 +0300
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID: <532770731.20150227235427@yandex.ru>
To: "Habermann, David (D)" <DAHabermann AT dow DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] (last?) TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.35-0.5
In-Reply-To: <C9D37D92E903B347A31B9CF82643BA280746391D@046-CH1MPN1-041.046d.mgd.msft.net>
References: <announce DOT 20150227175205 DOT GP11124 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>   <C9D37D92E903B347A31B9CF82643BA280746391D AT 046-CH1MPN1-041 DOT 046d DOT mgd DOT msft DOT net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Greetings, Habermann, David (D)!

>> Since Cygwin 1.7.34, chmod does not always affect the POSIX permission
>>  mask as returned by stat(2) or printed by ls(1), due to the improved
>>  POSIX ACL handling.  As a temporary workaround, chmod now checks if

> I'm a neophyte regarding this ACL handling stuff.  Here is my usage model,
> which probably isn't that far from the model for many Cygwin users:  I use
> Cygwin to process/manage files within the c:\cygwin folder structure, and a
> very limited number of other folders/files (e.g. /cygdrive/f/backups/...). 
> I don't require complex security on any of these, and would like to keep things very simple.

> 1) Are there any ACL records that might be inherited from windows down into
> my structures (I'm in a corporate environment where the corporation "messes"
> with many things, so our windows might not be "as out of the box").

There's no ACL inheritance enabled inside Cygwin root by default, so no.
To your backups folder, the answer depends on your fstab settings.

> 2) How can I detect/eliminate any ACLs within my folder structures of interest?

You better don't.


--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru) 27.02.2015, <23:53>

Sorry for my terrible english...


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple