X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=GUpYvH7a/sR6czzfmBCbfeBoreT8r V95XMIGC2dZ4KqvDsUgGWFN9bAtg74+Vw0CgOBxmaFZ1sGJSlH0PWOK6a6KDHSSi Ri257GOSHcCiNgGr61yz6jr6H0Zqg9jhrmCN6AR9xMfz+5JhqPsV7dqRuXkXRnBP wW4VXJP65F6HKw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; s=default; bh=xkjdaVnelsQTNTiIXatnc/xcVPM=; b=usn Tz+rIP9G/6kLCY4ZJdxzfLwFVh7WBo+4g3Zpq5pb4PaP7uZtkBlUvdxtxYC3uDvR 3+Ob4iRLcOz3ilcrUFayhaovdkQt5jhOz5ySwXbQIx5zAlDJV4sZeqAkn/WgKQWH AoWmY93DvuDz9/idRJV+Nl6oFJC6x1OfIelPprxQ= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com From: "Habermann, David (D)" To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] (last?) TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.35-0.5 Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:03:07 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: 046-CH1MMR1-005.046d.mgd.msft.net X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: dow.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is 65.52.44.158) smtp.mailfrom=DAHabermann AT dow DOT com; cygwin.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:65.52.44.158;CTRY:US;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(428002)(5423002)(47776003)(62966003)(2920100001)(6806004)(450100001)(92566002)(2900100001)(46102003)(2501003)(105586002)(102836002)(22756005)(77156002)(107886001)(104016003)(2950100001)(106116001)(2656002)(55846006)(50466002)(54356999)(76176999)(50986999)(87936001)(2351001)(101416001)(86362001)(110136001)(86146001)(23676002)(33656002)(22746005)(79686002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:CY1PR0101MB0873;H:mail.bsnconnect.com;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;LANG:en; X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: BL2FFO11FD047.protection.gbl X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: BL2FFO11FD047.protection.gbl X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR0101MB0873; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR0101MB0873; X-Forefront-PRVS: 05009853EF X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR0101MB0873; X-OriginatorOrg: dow.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Feb 2015 18:03:10.9031 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: c3e32f53-cb7f-4809-968d-1cc4ccc785fe X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=c3e32f53-cb7f-4809-968d-1cc4ccc785fe;Ip=[65.52.44.158] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0101MB0873 X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id t1RI3baT014095 > Since Cygwin 1.7.34, chmod does not always affect the POSIX permission > mask as returned by stat(2) or printed by ls(1), due to the improved > POSIX ACL handling. As a temporary workaround, chmod now checks if I'm a neophyte regarding this ACL handling stuff. Here is my usage model, which probably isn't that far from the model for many Cygwin users: I use Cygwin to process/manage files within the c:\cygwin folder structure, and a very limited number of other folders/files (e.g. /cygdrive/f/backups/...). I don't require complex security on any of these, and would like to keep things very simple. 1) Are there any ACL records that might be inherited from windows down into my structures (I'm in a corporate environment where the corporation "messes" with many things, so our windows might not be "as out of the box"). 2) How can I detect/eliminate any ACLs within my folder structures of interest?