X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=S1aynLRwt3d1AEVG v/QmjXIkw1fTQWmKYrRC8kxefQjFi0B62ksfTIXphfbmyd+4nWcsULG/Y0UbwVKV TANdxV5sv98HqATesdtGBwOMvu4Xm2PSIO56W4wA71VTSnzvQmlWqLu/itr6EIHp 0fHaip7qYL45QiFEmwk+aGM0bag= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Q2HTK3Dcm3nfp8OpXPW2Ak 1A8Vw=; b=hrvaRUfZcqp+GuLEvnHsR/a6CYRYEDLpMk9vPuC/6XBeU/k5Zyou2Y zDxH9JKapyvZtscMfvj38F19GPLz125KNkY2CHi6q6zrzmtPt0cYBGAiHz4VCxSb 2vXd89DxNsQF2k0Y2AiTRwhRmJ8rBsWqBukkREcIShEDR+cDXkHVw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_60,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.ht-systems.ru Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:02:09 +0300 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <30313619.20150227170209@yandex.ru> To: random user , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Too Many Permissions Stripped In 1.7.35? In-Reply-To: <54F00036.8050509@gmail.com> References: <54F00036 DOT 8050509 AT gmail DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Greetings, random user! > (Less sure I think this is really a good idea, but it'd seem consistent > with treating SYSTEM this way given the standard default ACLs on > /c/Users/): Should Administrators be treated the same as SYSTEM? No, totally. As I wrote in my list reply, which server appears to have eaten, SYSTEM is a Windows equivalent for 'root', but unlike POSIX root, doesn't have an implicit carte blanche. All Windows rights are explicit. You have to either grant access to the system, or to grant SeBackup* rights to user. -- WBR, Andrey Repin, 27.02.2015, <16:59> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple