X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=Vew4kRbWY6d8SbfMmXKKgLF8wHCoSKOKLaaJSsVa7zNpApbPFnzXN
	TR53cUrSwK28dK8mnn33SCpTSyxYzfacBts2jWBLIAyYN6/pxgE2kIFvp0ROpV/h
	vpkrpYj/4evTuB1S4KwNKLSxNnfKhxo66WHHMDTJ93J6cFuReOzSB4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=K3vAnkeA5IDL27O+HyKFjuV3JzU=; b=Q80mccAIMp1R6HW9zGn1z+6DEZ7q
	rqBMMShtQjo6yI+B5J9/gwsbesQlylvR6ARvEby7sA2Cphs42X/OQug23D7miQMz
	hTrufxJoyCxTPNWwPyvJXgaLJ2/S7BYDTrkwFWIwxLIFMexyOaUN8vrTV2nvGLnt
	6B7asi72cUJ0nq8=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:21:57 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: slow startup after upgrade
Message-ID: <20150227092157.GK11124@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20150225125220 DOT GA437 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <A55CCFE32575429CB57E7CCABAE696A1 AT Tamar> <mcln8a$vnq$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <1424909523 DOT 1976 DOT 47 DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com> <mcnu7h$c42$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <20150226202452 DOT GA10024 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <54EF8DDF DOT 4030008 AT redhat DOT com> <20150226223106 DOT GB11124 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <54EFA9C2 DOT 3080407 AT redhat DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9a9Vq1BJdYBEXpLG"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54EFA9C2.3080407@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--9a9Vq1BJdYBEXpLG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Feb 26 16:18, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/26/2015 03:31 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Feb 26 14:19, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> On 02/26/2015 01:24 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>>>> Fixes are in snapshots, as well as test releases (currently 1.7.35-=
0.4)
> >>>>> which can be installed with setup*.exe.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hmmm... https://cygwin.com/faq-nochunks.html#faq.setup.snapshots say=
s:
> >>>>
> >>>> You cannot use Cygwin Setup to install a snapshot.
> >>>
> >>> Hmmm... maybe you should try to read Yaakov's entire sentence?
> >>
> >> Or maybe his point was that we need to update the FAQ wording now that
> >> it is out of date and no longer matching reality.
> >=20
> > I don't understand.  It's still not possible to install a snapshot with
> > setup.  What's wrong with the FAQ entry?
>=20
> Oh, I was equating test releases (1.7.35-0.4) with snapshots (since each
> test release has matched a particular snapshot),

Only because I did it so.  There's no automatism.

> but I guess you are
> distinguishing between them (since we have a lot more snapshots than
> what gets promoted to test release).  So maybe all we need is something
> along the lines of:
>=20
> In general, snapshots cannot be installed via setup; however, there have
> been cases of a snapshot promoted to a test release that can be
> installed using the 'Experimental' know within setup.

I don't want them to be mixed into the same pot.  Test releases are
probably not bug-free, but in general I expect them to be a bit more
stable than a snapshot.  A snapshot is allowed to screw up terribly, a
test release isn't (or shouldn't).  That I created snapshots together
with the test releases was just to make sure that snapshot were not
in a worse shape than the test releases.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--9a9Vq1BJdYBEXpLG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=dif+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9a9Vq1BJdYBEXpLG--