X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=KohkFwggESJnyauLyZLQEjSDGmEjimKgKVSYoxr02rm
	Hq3J9oEeWladWlg1851rQXtQNJrwgc/4KS27plZvBh/2uIGAgW17XmSRi5zp5KOR
	UTpcyLYT6lJhlWauzrSTjKOs5jGLlFRx4n5LOKh2MZjpnN0nbPhuXobj9LzulEwk
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject
	:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=F1x9G8m3hV9E+adwDE+k1nXV5nI=; b=TNgoo3t1aGWKBaL6J
	lVjHUI0TFYPC07yf09WP2xV0NeS2E6LWA00xqTebt6ZDAm4vkFFOSdOJNbId6fmB
	rB3cexBBUOruYRXXRZeyXYHG0OMElCyjDTkfmBeTlsQPCSVL4XB/y3cgIVFDPlNg
	qjUYt7mrF6Dp6S2jE54XbwYYn4=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: Yes, score=5.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HK_RANDOM_FROM,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_SEMBACKSCATTER,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-pd0-f194.google.com
X-Received: by 10.68.65.12 with SMTP id t12mr21160516pbs.42.1425015586994;        Thu, 26 Feb 2015 21:39:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54F00319.3000003@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 21:39:37 -0800
From: random user <cnpxzsdwle4m0dkt AT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: oops!  apologies to Corinna
References: <54F00036 DOT 8050509 AT gmail DOT com> <54F00235 DOT 9000609 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <54F00235.9000609@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Umm... Sorry! I hope it's clear to all, I meant Corinna !

On 2/26/2015 9:27 PM, random user wrote:
>> Regarding Corrinne's proposal to treat SYSTEM's ACE distinct from others
>> in forming the apparent group permission "mask":
>>
>> Might it be sensible to do somewhat similar for the case where a file's
>> owner is the same as its primary group (i.e., same SID)?  It has seemed
>> the chmod behavior for this case has long been what's proposed (at least
>> for the typical case of a chmod leaving the user with wider privileges
>> than the group), but the group permission bits have appeared set to ls
>> and other tools.  It would seem to help re ~/.ssh and other cases that
>> are checked by programs wanting there to not be any group permissions.
>>
>> (Less sure I think this is really a good idea, but it'd seem consistent
>> with treating SYSTEM this way given the standard default ACLs on
>> /c/Users/<user>):  Should Administrators be treated the same as SYSTEM?
>>
>> ----
>>
>> As long as I'm posting:  My hearty thanks to Corrinne, Yaakov, and the
>> many others for their work to make Cygwin as full and useful a system as
>> it has become.
>>


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple