X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=eDE D+sIF4FMaw7gFVFcRPnjhnZhZ598IrJoOqbzylTZGXgyuANcu8/yT6OXxMfhf7WQ hZnUItQ90FXPB8apr0DN5WfwpQETMbFwoITsGv9EC7puC1xsB9YL2MIaF4PBex7i 0otOEMFXY6IkzXSsf9sXY6p1KTGL1bKV2ODYKGXA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=Io53lgkrc zpCasLP/X+2ygXx2yI=; b=r1fDOdCrmtWgJXux2L7Ol1B+8K7g3iJ0U8cpkPFI/ 7kdjon8yZDIMSlKhg6IKq36GSrXrzmIE5zhL8T6sO2vD3JAWbRa7yBkBCxZC7LPe zXVmvBgHzUvy8J4Et0NfJ4TiXqViD+cQuTmo7d5sQK9MeR/2CTZWvs5qc4omJZQu aY= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HK_RANDOM_FROM,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pa0-f65.google.com X-Received: by 10.70.127.131 with SMTP id ng3mr20983641pdb.31.1425014849256; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 21:27:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54F00036.8050509@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 21:27:18 -0800 From: random user User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Too Many Permissions Stripped In 1.7.35? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Regarding Corrinne's proposal to treat SYSTEM's ACE distinct from others in forming the apparent group permission "mask": Might it be sensible to do somewhat similar for the case where a file's owner is the same as its primary group (i.e., same SID)? It has seemed the chmod behavior for this case has long been what's proposed (at least for the typical case of a chmod leaving the user with wider privileges than the group), but the group permission bits have appeared set to ls and other tools. It would seem to help re ~/.ssh and other cases that are checked by programs wanting there to not be any group permissions. (Less sure I think this is really a good idea, but it'd seem consistent with treating SYSTEM this way given the standard default ACLs on /c/Users/): Should Administrators be treated the same as SYSTEM? ---- As long as I'm posting: My hearty thanks to Corrinne, Yaakov, and the many others for their work to make Cygwin as full and useful a system as it has become. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple