X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=X7eetOB2SWW8wYXXW7ograLncQju5 /dY4h15VTpAy23jybmFEVdS+zzApjSg2spoRMR/Zurgif+qllo16uPPbeO7XT6gy hIFd3en68yhDIOEqWwXhTvDxbKPkRK92hZXjePZgPOA9dPiU8I6flCBmuyfojc0d jMvdBtZRUos2S8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; s=default; bh=OYyDkFr5q3GNJYufdRb91T4QRxI=; b=rGd s5V+ImramN02T/5BvBANe3Mz/2JlV6Zw64cGYtwbjUM3Z8lkEDANCGirtkDxggNa Rmts8VUdjoH7S7boTPxbJBiQTmniUxWqvtr/wm3F93/x5sNwiJnRRkJ8dKRh+lYz zzVE6pLhnSicesoOSHbIUbpqy9+WUfuQNkZ6hicY= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-lb0-f181.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.153.4.44 with SMTP id cb12mr9302866lad.26.1424979301063; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:35:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:35:01 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Too Many Permissions Stripped In 1.7.35? From: Bryan Berns To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes I honestly haven't read up exactly how Cygwin interprets NTFS ACL/ACEs, but I remember seeing on the mailing list that a change was made in 1.7.35 was made to permission handling. It is preferable in my organization that the SYSTEM account always have full control the local file system. When using chmod under 1.7.35, it looks like permissions for SYSTEM get stripped (as well as some others). Is this the desired behavior? If so, I'll workaround it somehow but just wanted to verify before we release this much anticipated Active Directory optimized version. For context, I'm running as the default Domain Administrator on a fresh install of Windows 8.1. @@@@@@ Testing With 1.7.34 @@@@@@ $ uname -a CYGWIN_NT-6.3 BERNS-WINDOWS 1.7.34(0.285/5/3) 2015-02-04 12:14 x86_64 Cygwin $ mkdir TEST-34 $ chmod 750 TEST-34 $ icacls TEST-34 TEST-34 DOMAIN\Administrator:(F) DOMAIN\Domain Users:(RX) Everyone:(Rc,S,RA) BUILTIN\Administrators:(OI)(CI)(F) NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(OI)(CI)(F) BUILTIN\Users:(OI)(CI)(RX) NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users:(M) NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users:(OI)(CI)(IO)(M) CREATOR OWNER:(OI)(CI)(IO)(F) CREATOR GROUP:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX) Everyone:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX) Successfully processed 1 files; Failed processing 0 files @@@@@@ Testing With 1.7.35 @@@@@@ $ uname -a CYGWIN_NT-6.3 BERNS-WINDOWS 1.7.35(0.286/5/3) 2015-02-25 13:13 x86_64 Cygwin $ mkdir TEST-35 $ chmod 750 TEST-35 $ icacls TEST-35 TEST-35 DOMAIN\Administrator:(F) DOMAIN\Domain Users:(RX) Everyone:(Rc,S,RA) BUILTIN\Administrators:(OI)(CI)(RX) NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(OI)(CI)(RX) BUILTIN\Users:(OI)(CI)(RX) NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users:(RX) NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users:(OI)(CI)(IO) CREATOR OWNER:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX) CREATOR GROUP:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX) Everyone:(OI)(CI)(IO)(RX) Successfully processed 1 files; Failed processing 0 files -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple