X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 q=dns; s=default; b=O2Ovh/iXri+VfDJY+hzCCOs4ZcGsGbxKhra6N7G1L4f
	YAkZEW0yYe63nll+sa2kvBLkGjyFCig9NcWWgojvmtMo5bhE0fcOe4j6wRBOJRsb
	OuUodvb5p7LI5t0PZ1JgOsm+n/rMJ+bWaAmAh7PsIudWF8ygE5Bu3+aNYqlhC8s0
	=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	 s=default; bh=NLxEhD+UsHOR+ktfaqAmEJG6kG4=; b=wdeZU5CU0FtoUpACe
	M6kTJqnTZYMUhMYeDGk0amGctf28nMH1FVgxUkLBJqpu4z+fwzOKfrneXrWvNWgi
	I/YdEWwiLH+Sjfa1COsPCqlkTcYhq8tl0mwp9ziWe5AvtFnk/GGAxYWOKE/d4yGb
	eT9UXjf900TPQrMIGYYlot4Isk=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mailscanner02.zoner.fi
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 12:45:55 +0200
From: Lasse Collin <lasse DOT collin AT tukaani DOT org>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Clearing O_NONBLOCK from a pipe may lose data
Message-ID: <20150226124555.2b17cc39@tukaani.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150224152449.GL437@calimero.vinschen.de>
References: <20150222220747 DOT 789401d2 AT tukaani DOT org>	<20150223105653 DOT GG437 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>	<20150223122345 DOT GM437 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>	<54EC2566 DOT 4030703 AT towo DOT net>	<20150224110953 DOT GF437 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>	<20150224161601 DOT 68f0a08c AT tukaani DOT org>	<20150224152449 DOT GL437 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus
Received-SPF: none
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 2015-02-24 Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 24 16:16, Lasse Collin wrote:
> > I'm going to release xz 5.2.1 in a day or two. Should that release
> > have a workaround for this Cygwin bug? The workaround would avoid
> > using O_NONBLOCK on stdout. It adds a race condition to signal
> > handling in xz but it's usually a very minor issue (xz 5.0.x has
> > the race and no one has complained). On the other hand, the fixes
> > to the threading bugs are somewhat important for xz too, so maybe I
> > should just add a note that xz 5.2.x isn't safe on Cygwin yet but
> > will be in the (somewhat) near future?
> 
> Whatever you prefer.  I think it's fine to point to using at least
> Cygwin 1.7.35, but if you can live with updating to some 5.2.2 after
> 1.7.35 comes out, the workaround in 5.2.1 would be nice.
> 
> I'm still working on performance improvements in the account handling,
> but when that's settled, I'm going for 1.7.35.  Let's say a week or
> two.

OK, thanks. I decided to tell people to use 1.7.35 or later. The
threading issues are one reason. Another reason is that if the
workaround is removed in 5.2.2, 5.2.1 will become a special release
that (mostly) worked on older Cygwin versions. I prefer to tell users
of old Cygwin version to use xz 5.0.x.

-- 
Lasse Collin  |  IRC: Larhzu @ IRCnet & Freenode

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple