X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=wu0+mpEGDaQXavcnYU0gCztlb40Cu FXbJ44EjzI1oizyYVe5dCEzwUVguMnff5tIGv8lW2CFonejQi1CNo4vrO2y4MdoY LPyvnTfmYKnqbYFTD0LVzkAUOQJnzr62MU7zJMCwewz+GD9xwipa4SA3Fha09psx 1dO/u15dlpi07s= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; s=default; bh=QyUIfcPaBHZ25FCX/bvtrgXfyVw=; b=sOh Gstzk5Njd26eegMvpBLz3vR7KU7jgwqTyl7txghJ2PdTCIrvemrqSgnUICtkc8dJ Ja+fmQ/NNAnFwCD7tM2bNFlWU6SFItNYxBYGQLjD08+XgXD1vzwLjJbc2hOtkoyn c7pJ+D91So/4lKpBNV4Po37V4ibbPhm0MOyYiXaI= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CGBQC9MuZU/51dJa1bgwZSWgSDBb04giqFcQIcgQdDAQEBAQEBfIQPAQEBAwEjEUoLAgEIGgIGIAICAjAVAgENAgQbiB8IDbtdmB8BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBIEhiW6EPRYigmgugRQFjVuBcINcghaEaIMTiziDPiKCAhyBUG+BRH8BAQE From: "Dennis Hagarty (dehagart)" To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Subject: RE: Very slow Cygwin startup on Windows 7 Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 19:04:05 +0000 Message-ID: <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4EE27AEC@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> References: <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4DC9F0E8 AT xmb-rcd-x01 DOT cisco DOT com> <87mw4nugdx DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4DC9F137 AT xmb-rcd-x01 DOT cisco DOT com> <869208266 DOT 20150210030528 AT yandex DOT ru> <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4EE263B8 AT xmb-rcd-x01 DOT cisco DOT com> <20150218111515 DOT GL8493 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4EE26DE4 AT xmb-rcd-x01 DOT cisco DOT com> <20150218125429 DOT GN8493 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4EE275A7 AT xmb-rcd-x01 DOT cisco DOT com> <20150219103235 DOT GD26084 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20150219103235.GD26084@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id t1JJ4PlP030701 Hi Corinna, >>>>>Can you please try this test version without cygserver, and with >>>>>the passwd and group settings in /etc/nsswitch.conf set to >>>>> >>>>> passwd: db >>>>> group: db >>>> >>>>> It would be very interesting to know if this improves the situation for you. >>>> >>>> Just did it for 1.7.35-0.2 - I haven't seen 0.3 turn up at a mirror site yet. >> >>>It's only just uploaded so it might take another while, depending >>>on your mirrors. According to Roger's results in >>>https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-02/msg00511.html and >>>https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-02/msg00543.html, the real problem >>>hadn't been fixed in the 0.2 test release, so you might give 0.3 >>>another chance. >> >> BTW - I did try ADInsight, but it didn't show me anything (maybe because this is a 64 bit windows?) >> >> Anyway, I ran it with 0.3 and nsswitch = db and the result is??? >> >> 1.68-1.72 seconds > >Hmm. No offense, but are you sure you ran this with 0.3? I knew you'd doubt me :-) CYGWIN_NT-6.1 DEHAGART-WS02 1.7.35(0.286/5/3) 2015-02-18 11:32 x86_64 Cygwin >> With nsswitch = files db it was 1.43-1.45 seconds. >> >> With nsswitch = files it was 0.13-0.14 seconds >> >> (It seems basically the same as 0.2) >It would be pretty helpful to get an idea what's so slow in your case. >Either you get ADInsight working, or... is it ok if I send you a link >to a debug-augmented DLL via PM? Sure. > Sysinternals "ADInsight" is a 32bit only tool and, in order to work on > a 64bit Windows you seem to have to manually inject the DLL > ADInsightDll.dll (which is extracted into %TEMP%) into the target > (32-bit!) process. So, it seems ADInsight seems a non-starter - for my skill level anyway.