X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=IwsfF18MyIKuK68BpxiXarXvsW5GU 9Ks/KVc3AUpyzmZUV/YlH+1PmEt2dfwtMeBhNtY4Qfny6S1FIb6snr/Uh+vftYj6 k9S1H1ItAqdH1b9KkGopbdI9LH59Sg1FDvWDGgZnELnEFToW87FWE6aLHH9JK7Y5 N69EMFssPBbKXk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; s=default; bh=t6ldRlP2Y9AqepDH8ivv0j48Q4E=; b=P/l NciPnj3+vDHnS7LPXKLWvNOZRNKlQQ7ydU13e3eZdq/gKDhwvaGKrvkxJ80TN4MH aS3m7CUAtqwPYQIUsbyZhS/HEVX+y1mHInB9yztOYW3fyxOXp8AHw/Rb4EVavwFF 3piRA+gNlZ53vi2pK5JJJ4caSLxcqYUvxPDIjKrE= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DCBQB5sOVU/5NdJa1bgwZSWgSDBL09giqFcQIcfEMBAQEBAQF8hA0BAQQjEVUCAQgaAgYgAgICMBUCAQ0CBBuIJw26CphDAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARUEgSGJboQ9OIJoLoEUBY9Eg1qGfoMQizCDPiKCAhyBUG+BRH8BAQE From: "Dennis Hagarty (dehagart)" To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Subject: RE: Very slow Cygwin startup on Windows 7 Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 09:49:03 +0000 Message-ID: <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4EE275A7@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com> References: <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4DC9F0E8 AT xmb-rcd-x01 DOT cisco DOT com> <87mw4nugdx DOT fsf AT Rainer DOT invalid> <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4DC9F137 AT xmb-rcd-x01 DOT cisco DOT com> <869208266 DOT 20150210030528 AT yandex DOT ru> <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4EE263B8 AT xmb-rcd-x01 DOT cisco DOT com> <20150218111515 DOT GL8493 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <3FEEC3A37A0B0A48AA326075128C32EE4EE26DE4 AT xmb-rcd-x01 DOT cisco DOT com> <20150218125429 DOT GN8493 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20150218125429.GN8493@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id t1J9nKd8004750 Hi Corinna, >>>Can you please try this test version without cygserver, and with >>>the passwd and group settings in /etc/nsswitch.conf set to >>> >>> passwd: db >>> group: db >> >>> It would be very interesting to know if this improves the situation for you. >> >> Just did it for 1.7.35-0.2 - I haven't seen 0.3 turn up at a mirror site yet. >It's only just uploaded so it might take another while, depending >on your mirrors. According to Roger's results in >https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-02/msg00511.html and >https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-02/msg00543.html, the real problem >hadn't been fixed in the 0.2 test release, so you might give 0.3 >another chance. BTW - I did try ADInsight, but it didn't show me anything (maybe because this is a 64 bit windows?) Anyway, I ran it with 0.3 and nsswitch = db and the result is??? 1.68-1.72 seconds With nsswitch = files db it was 1.43-1.45 seconds. With nsswitch = files it was 0.13-0.14 seconds (It seems basically the same as 0.2) Regards Dennis