X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=xZ8eqf+8GGxfifuqvsufZhdRMcydZ+bFlE5vSYQeF9WL6/mu2Hg51
	uTEJwfWrqfxorTHIdPYxtTecUCwjR1glx86cXks/tw/s5C/6GqK/oB1osmYOrZme
	YIQg16hAX1vrs6xp1HeUVl+NbQWypzzLJC1aqYAMoXCDfVnObfgaUs=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=LxfIbAXKYtRB4BMhyRfWzr99eos=; b=PQGCj77HawOzb/T/GK2/5Us3+//Y
	O9joLLV23OabQfVzn0P3BzsQb+hIt0yLjYEf78DmEF+qjEa6RYc+erCDgISNXtmA
	X/gzyUbg+rKStMHSbr9EqQVsOeLw7C6tV1DEV+DzDY/iXjKtLlZgWaadKD6BDq9c
	11Wq95Oa0VdIHUw=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 10:22:47 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Is db_home: windows exactly equivalent to db_home: /%H?
Message-ID: <20150219092247.GB26084@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <1762B585-7043-4D21-8318-4E474A67AE16 AT etr-usa DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1762B585-7043-4D21-8318-4E474A67AE16@etr-usa.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Feb 18 21:46, Warren Young wrote:
> I was just scanning through the ntsec page, and saw that the =E2=80=9Cwin=
dows=E2=80=9D scheme does the same thing as /%H.  I tried it, and it seems =
to be true.
>=20
> Is there some minor difference?

Yes.  The windows scheme is always just /%H, while %H allows
something like /%H/cygwin.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=FEVY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--f2QGlHpHGjS2mn6Y--