X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject
	:from:to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=
	dns; s=default; b=unBwuxs0b/5m9rr6Fh5ppTiSyNW6xYZ00Zma8uQ/aU3Zcm
	D1g7rjbTn9X5Qu/RTESvB61TAGgi4aKnC8fxByNKOmXpoQ61ezhy/ZgBf35PjD+2
	c/rE1tc7i2FB/ufEd0oYrheBAcMiw56U/P5VilRY5gYAY83Fu9rFybALa/JwM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject
	:from:to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=
	default; bh=910XwhzrYYtjjcrnG0WO5E+BoNE=; b=Maloa59JBideJ8KAAakI
	CWTM0e6gbN8F8ctVx0eBd/4vv+zmqFa5uRBMIWO9Y6yy0n84MKWCAf9MhXmkSsZH
	1YnuYwbcoSuzSAgCaNWLxhzoFzyOMRywTUHcne+dg0eauHd6wwLTpiuLypuQ7Q1+
	gw2EHVTgR4NSG0HL90ua8Ko=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: lb3-smtp-cloud3.xs4all.net
Message-ID: <49e242359dc8f039b24fd19b9552b4ac.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20150216145034.GD8493@calimero.vinschen.de>
References: <8c468e18fb38e4fd8e5a5eb5a80470d5 DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT xs4all DOT nl>    <24ce5e2192219ce6e2162428af523c1d DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT xs4all DOT nl>    <20150216145034 DOT GD8493 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 17:40:14 +0100
Subject: Re: setfacl: root of all evil?
From: "Houder" <houder AT xs4all DOT nl>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.18
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

> On Feb 16 14:53, Houder wrote:
>> > Hi Corinna,
>> >
>> > Yes, sorry, setfacl again ...
>> [snip]
>>
>> > RFC :-)
>
> Dumb bug in Cygwin.  I found it and fixed it locally.

Indeed? Did expect a deliberate different school of thoughts ... Apparently,
not.

[snip]

> Actually, I don't think I'm going to apply the fix anyway.  As I
> mentioned last week, I'm mulling over a complete rewrite of the core
> functionality of chmod/acl to read and create ACLs in a unified way
> within a single set of functions, rather than having two sets of
> functions doing almost, but (as you noticed) not exactly the same thing.

Yes, took notice of that.

> I have a notion how to create more strict, more correct POSIX ACLs
> within the restrictions of Windows ACLs than the current implenentation,
> but this needs a lot of hacking and testing so it's not done quickly.

Alright. Not in hurry awaiting a solution (at least, I am not). Take your
time ...

Henri


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple