X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=cEBHS4l3F6eSsz2PMbhKri2TAeHO/upjvxhVngHqEup enRL6p7BhS/jloYUzANExdKpQl9n8Y9D67oLdWS88hmh8oYWXY1XNBa2wAFSyKBz Z624etQjrc5/snnQoR1UvO9SSy9y5XyHy4GjZK0noCv+a41J4qoVGz7ipHaexkjE = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=lMJUcmJpA4sPaG2VlSvdSFGd16s=; b=PVM4wmS1/yVPE5bDT ooVhHGFHPu8XCMWH1/yspcyVIukhgKLcgbNr+a93UUhqOJ2KuP8Z4n6c52jUcjQX wbH2k5TnieEzuLG/Ikic3jF+lY8BUJXYBhZvDoKguM9faG8lO4uWCvPaoEadUDne 9hMd3dKMZ49BxWyAL7BsUSvyTk= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Message-ID: <1423450152.8420.25.camel@cygwin.com> Subject: Re: Problem with vprintf () in Clang 3.4.2 From: Yaakov Selkowitz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 20:49:12 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1423031737.596.2.camel@cygwin.com> References: <1423031737 DOT 596 DOT 2 DOT camel AT cygwin DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On Wed, 2015-02-04 at 00:35 -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 16:50 -0300, Thomas Wuillemin wrote: > > While running some simple tests with the C vprintf function, I > > detected different results between Gcc and Clang , where Clang seems > > to be badly wrong. > > > > Here is the faulty code that leads to a reproducible error (at least > > in my configuration): > [snip] > > Confirmed, although only on x86_64-cygwin. This is fixed in 3.4.2-5, which will be uploaded in the next day or so. Thanks again for the report and STC. -- Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple