X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject :from:to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q= dns; s=default; b=xntO3nMOrNbQEQPXceRGZp5IbsWTIESOFsniO+ARPawAMy F/djzNILQFViyMSLQ6lU09CZpepGUrUPWQF50z691zVgws47g5FaT0XmEGYwMJps XqFbTl1dXqEQuVLuyvSk1su71Pb2rN0T8Bir3OjhJDxITJEbhCBynctrXIqZw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject :from:to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= default; bh=RmMiXgRNziLz/L+t0PyoECkUrvM=; b=bzxY7Ks9CVYGFFaML9/i Y6QIQPzDBR1h7hWFYOo0sFZpzGKROZCtZzC6maD6qooNUjVrF/iVB0+BnZ/ouTml CWdCa3LNRt9yyez5ND+U/7IsD+LiwmwCJza0Upeqy09twYdwGlLILkh9PGQvYBfz 8IuW3kPdmCDQmSn9y7MigGM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: lb2-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <54CA2371.3000604@gmail.com> References: <1f4de2a711aa1f1a5c9084b0765a5161 DOT squirrel AT webmail DOT xs4all DOT nl> <54CA2371 DOT 3000604 AT gmail DOT com> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 13:46:13 +0100 Subject: Re: Version numbering of gcc in setup.ini - Jonathan Yong? From: "Houder" To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes > On 1/29/2015 19:57, Houder wrote: [snip] >> As far as I understand, -4 is the "best" release of version 4.8.3-*. Just wondering ... I would say that >> setup.ini SHOULD show -4 as previous. What do say? >> > > -3 and -4 is broken iirc, I had to revert to -2 to build 4.9.x. Aha ... missed that. So ... one (of the few?) cases, where I SHOULD have downgraded :-) (or upgraded to the latest version, which I would normally do). Thanks for your reply. Henri -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple