X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=m3uoBQDsG/+5nGlPiwi2um7SOcap9/sWNB6j3RbP5ffZs+jo+prXB
	ID8IbB2xsaj5urZaNXYbTvDY7/+1+nga5PZOoO8PT8xQHD+W6d/j04ej/Y9jHf8F
	buGE95jNEV4JVDknFSnBOY5HH8662BbdwYFqTvyDckcNYgYhjp4IQw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=K2reBzU2I5KVSRqS/S0+4amwm5A=; b=YDicNMfMQI8mB6CUhyJHJZNozsaj
	yjsIIFzYMlkOCOjegGWBW49Qq8Mb2aUitQKnq4MZDgBxwGwk0yzJhxDbRGtSFYpF
	kUGtQkUeTKD8rwqg8+F2rEQppGbF/QyMYwqhf6kkhcn6AMvBw7LAW5XUnho6mVsQ
	JumW7YUqfcfYJ3c=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 22:51:02 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: RFD: cygwin ACLs: NFS or POSIX model: ease in adapting to CIFS ACLs?
Message-ID: <20150107215102.GD4190@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <549756D2 DOT 8000600 AT tlinx DOT org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <549756D2.8000600@tlinx.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Dec 21 15:25, Linda Walsh wrote:
> I seem to remember that the cygwin ACL's were based on NFS acls not
> the POSIX ACL's.

No, they are POSIX ACLs with Solaris API.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=SpyM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN--