DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=YaEossoBh7kZQZAi
	VgoE/x/IbpMf/VTPPRnZ56Dqc8euWjUtG7duyvHvJQAcp47ZyhmC9W8AxrDAt9E5
	ZSP8B/isxTsW9kQ81qFnvTlnEkmlIAoaLHLZRCZmolQZhZ52IKcTyDOpfX1g2oYm
	m6xtjOO5X23vjD6Mujgygr2TWko=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id: <54AA0E25.9070903@cygwin.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 23:08:05 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Backwards compatibility
References: <54A92475 DOT 9090701 AT blankersfamily DOT com>
In-reply-to: <54A92475.9090701@blankersfamily.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 01/04/2015 06:31 AM, Laurens Blankers wrote:
> Of course this question doesn't come out of the blue. It is triggered by the
> release of xinit 1.3.4-1 last month, which breaks setups for many people. If
> you like you can check the cygwin-xfree mailing list. Unfortunately the
> responds from the package maintainers has been: The way it has worked for
> years was a bug, your setup is wrong. Which would be fine if there was
> documentation on how to do this, or even a way to do this, but there is
> neither. There seems to be a general unwillingness among the maintainers to
> acknowledge that user experience matters.
>
> Before you ask, yes, I did post this to the cygwin-xfree mailing list.
> However I am not getting anywhere there. So I am interested in the thoughts
> of the wider, beyond X11, Cygwin community on backwards compatibility.

As I mention in my response to the cygwin-xfree thread you're referring to
here(<https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2015-01/msg00008.html>), you
haven't been conversing with package maintainers.  I believe that the
statements you've made above which you say came from maintainers are ones
you're attributing to me.  And as I asked you before and do again in my
response in that thread and here as well, please don't attribute statements
that I didn't make to me.  The statements you make don't represent my
views, it's not polite to misrepresent another's views, and doing so
doesn't advance your cause.  Beyond that, I won't re-iterate
any comments I made in that thread other than to say I agree that any
discussion of this as a policy should happen separate from any discussion
about the xinit package and it's most recent release.


-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple