DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=lYTj0Wh+QutuAsyd
	GX/A4k50xXgabBL5PMHyTd+sJ+cxXQGJqRSf+++/xOKHmIWbzHb6zw0ZtVD4qx5P
	vTAy1wFP//nwXN3O+PRNa4ks8Bi3gYcbWhms9gN2CZZz/caU4cCHtiOrO9RKI7qU
	xdnd0EjYgISoBTjkMOzs0bvsdu8=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-id: <549F98F8.5030307@cygwin.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 00:45:28 -0500
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: cygwin64 has no LISP package
References: <CALz=zzkbE_4f34KAR0yAM6EwEdRmB5qHW1_==iVTQp=f-t_0Kg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-reply-to: <CALz=zzkbE_4f34KAR0yAM6EwEdRmB5qHW1_==iVTQp=f-t_0Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 12/27/2014 11:38 PM, Phil _ wrote:
> cygwin64 has no package with any version of LISP. I install cygwin
> largely to use LISP, and have to keep both cygwin32 and cygwin64
> installations just for clisp, which is in cygwin32.
>
> Some of the available packages use LISP, so there must be a LISP in
> there somewhere. Is there a way to use that hidden lisp interpreter,
> or to install the 32-bit clisp package in cygwin64?

Without knowing what packages you're referring to, it's hard to be
more specific but I believe that you'll find the packages that use
LISP are doing so only through scripts that aren't crucial to the
package operation.  They are helper scripts, Emacs utilities, etc.
There is, of course, no reason that these LISP scripts can't be run
using the 32-bit version of LISP, as you've recognized, so this is
your best recourse at the moment if you prefer to wait for a 64-bit
version to be provided as part of distribution.  Otherwise, you can
always build a version for yourself while you wait for the official
version.

-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple