X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=lX YjZwg+6H8fOsi7T8Jn/S6pyhNlexUEJi6OM03Km7EreuZ92eWPmDqV8IJpxG/7Cu uTYRSwI1RqaMn9P2KilMCo45w382sHR6bLZoy/c33Ob2c1aubCn/Mcm/nXgOD55O QAMf60NpO9lSYh/AHbde2Ecpq2j4kRlVpSAi3HoqE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=tTYX6brT mXlt+0ESdw6wSxDtMUw=; b=rUTaB4YgDtUVlgbfSXrJghEhgWdPOYRZzUIf6Mhh aB+stwTIdozn/7uNhH3JSCLSTCl52sy799qD4B8NmqViVIav3i2MGEK+tF4M9dLH db2IZcBZOo7iTDxox8qRybkT/yBvEHm5Uzyk4on3rS2I+2dy+JdRZkA3gL2retnF 6Qc= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pd0-f175.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.147.102 with SMTP id tj6mr54838054pab.95.1418054623187; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 08:03:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141208155009.GU3810@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <20141208144003 DOT GP3810 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20141208155009 DOT GU3810 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 16:03:43 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: proc_retry question From: xmoon 2000 To: cygwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes On 8 December 2014 at 15:50, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > Please don't top-post. Thank you. > > > On Dec 8 14:48, xmoon 2000 wrote: >> On 8 December 2014 at 14:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> > On Dec 8 12:40, xmoon 2000 wrote: >> >> I have set proc_retry = 10. >> >> >> >> I still get the following error message but showing rety 10: >> >> >> >> >> >> 0 [main] sh 35392 fork: child -1 - forked process 35736 died >> >> unexpectedly, retry 10, exit code 0xC0000005, errno 11 >> >> /q/onlyPastEnd.sh: fork: retry: Resource temporarily unavailable >> >> >> >> Does this mean it got an error and cygwin will now retry 10 times? >> >> >> >> OR does it mean it retry-ed 10 and failed? >> > >> > It tried 10 times and failed. >> >> Are you certain about that? > > No. Sorry, it's the other way around. If retry is 10, no retry > occured. AFAICS that's because you get an C000005 status code, which is > STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION. In case of this error code, Cygwin does > explicitely not retry. > > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Red Hat Do this suggest that I need to do the rebaseall - as documented in: http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/cygwin-x-faq.html#q-fork-failures -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple