X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=au TSUYJGK/RTlSqeNXe4+feMAY37wVtfjUUubOR2WOj0rNQp46VixgxrrA4ZKZV6yg sFqMZrbcZZUhoBw8QihCGPuJy9QkITE/ydRgEvHCw2sLPlBIzdAHA8qBnmsVBLyx SBd6n2Ui1fK+Q93Bsz+PZGsH3xa330JipQIZ6zzts= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=bGGvH8Da BqYVVJNlOgx1e2Gp5UE=; b=KR97N4Pu/mDZSK3cimYseYpkaSF/jfxvytz6syiP A9FssjR+mo+w+IF/m+q5J9q+yn2OCXegW2WwuWVPD7gUdkNXS+oaI94UuaA9s0Ie MiiSv4oHKn9ywG0xfyQKZacreg0Iwddk1wLCiiTBHrPg8KIN69fI8X6lffVi7RLP FHc= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pa0-f42.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.135.100 with SMTP id pr4mr60954254pbb.123.1418050112336; Mon, 08 Dec 2014 06:48:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20141208144003.GP3810@calimero.vinschen.de> References: <20141208144003 DOT GP3810 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 14:48:32 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: proc_retry question From: xmoon 2000 To: cygwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes Are you certain about that? Judging from the results - it appears to have worked. I consistently get the same final results, whereas before, when CYGWIN was unset completely, I got random results. On 8 December 2014 at 14:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Dec 8 12:40, xmoon 2000 wrote: >> I have set proc_retry = 10. >> >> I still get the following error message but showing rety 10: >> >> >> 0 [main] sh 35392 fork: child -1 - forked process 35736 died >> unexpectedly, retry 10, exit code 0xC0000005, errno 11 >> /q/onlyPastEnd.sh: fork: retry: Resource temporarily unavailable >> >> Does this mean it got an error and cygwin will now retry 10 times? >> >> OR does it mean it retry-ed 10 and failed? > > It tried 10 times and failed. > > > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple