X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to
	:subject:date:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=PyY3Yv+T3q0V4pZK
	RGzHeKPlMIiHlsFbKCUlpqcI/Zj6DsRLFrcgm9TubSfZsEBh7AXlMrERSV1rRHtS
	hgGSt+b/2BiXK0GL/Flu0c8XLGyyk0JfX36TAYTDFWx8hi+AyxEJFDEZra3eZ4yH
	DuZuTQbBtHaZf3VxTSkKRjMaoJM=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:from:to:references:in-reply-to
	:subject:date:mime-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=0pC0ogcUfnfUNt49096kx0
	8dHdo=; b=NAJyc7cAnPjpfOfB9dw5SFbgzn7rTC0pUsmFGKGUSdM96M7VIBCfUt
	u+mxPtOgsoJRp919uq5/SATo7XuGZVoW7CNxUFrd+0T3eaG2hixf/hGS4xBhFjbk
	94lzVnjQbPXPppdFyeTZ6SahLOLFqvYHZIRDpnHzB/6DIgAPwjoek=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPAM_SUBJECT1 autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: BAY004-OMC1S28.hotmail.com
X-TMN: [7ydj61Hvngk0imxPjAJpN5S6lAVZv5g+]
Message-ID: <BAY169-DS507DB2170B09396FB2EDF4A78A0@phx.gbl>
From: "Tony Kelman" <tony AT kelman DOT net>
To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References: <BAY169-DS2686C452E98CEE170F3245A7B00 AT phx DOT gbl> <542AD9EE DOT 6050700 AT gmail DOT com> <542AE57F DOT 2000106 AT cygwin DOT com> <BAY169-DS38D1002C668CBF6EA5B33AA7B80 AT phx DOT gbl> <542BC3A6 DOT 3000402 AT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <542BC3A6.3000402@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: package update for cygwin CMake
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 23:47:29 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;	format=flowed;	charset="Windows-1252";	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

>> The same number of CMake unit tests passed with an unpatched bootstrap
>> straight from the upstream sources, so I didn't get the entire rationale.
>>
>> -Tony
>
> PathCygwinToWin32 was using a deprecated cygwin_conv_to_win32
> that is not present in x86_64 version of cygwin.

I've updated this set of patches for cmake 3.1.0-rc2 (I can post the builds
if anyone would like to test them) at 
https://github.com/tkelman/cygwin-cmake
As with 3.0.2, there is no difference in the number of CMake's self-tests
that fail with unpatched sources from upstream vs applying Yaakov's set of
patches (with my updates so they apply to the latest version). I don't
see anything using cygwin_conv_to_win32 in 3.x, there are some uses of
cygwin_conv_path which are disabled by Yaakov's patches however.

I'm still willing to adopt the package, it appears Bill has been too busy
to upload a more recent version over the past 6 weeks.

Yaakov (or anyone else), is there any way you can provide test cases
that would fail without applying each of these patches? I can pursue
adding such cases to CMake's test suite and working to get the patches
incorporated upstream.

Thanks,
Tony


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple