X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=ZWg56rXrOZyegq3/ryYb9fHDBhVJCLaKfZHm+pDrZRYfZaMtzLV6d x1k8ediRzZ3nq1VBUEZqOCBBpLTH8SBQEBZoFlz6TEaQaOv9SMVNlcUfOuO7o7L3 F0E1+jsImez7Nn0Dx7Q9t6b8T9ur+WYj9ze4gtPtJB39m3zvIEKFOQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=UVfN8Re/1MxYadi1E0yk1pF/cis=; b=Kq+Ovw8hONOi74rTou7mTGOcYyOi JrNYI2mN9Yr9dteAYWrozBxct6nvwt6fVRbORElmbwrYWmti3Cwq2rmWX9ec5/zm yogo3BKl+fwpMNsYuzd7ExsT1IvurW9HQdMRTorFaQQTs+P35KawbglYVxBwsz8s ZIyCzoIMultT1jU= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Ivan Todoroski Subject: Re: Notable performance improvement in 64-bit build Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 23:29:32 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 20 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Csaba Raduly writes: > Do you have the same .profile in both installations? Yes, the two installations are actually sharing the same home dir, I have both of them configured to use HOME=%USERPROFILE%. > Do you have the same bash-completion package (often the most > time-consuming part of bash startup)? I don't have the "bash-completion" package installed at all, neither in the 32-bit nor 64-bit installs. I just double checked this now. Also, I didn't mention this in the original mail, but to make sure I was comparing apples to apples I actually put "set -x" at the top of the .profile script, then I ran it under the 32-bit and 64-bit installs and compared the outputs using "diff", to make sure the exact sequence of steps was executed in both cases. Of course I removed the "set -x" for the actual benchmark measurements. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple