X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=oZ
	F20nkoyAzfEjgBx3YXfIN9UFn6qNy9HmZZas3rlhR8Y1R6ZC/g5zuIsUmmUSASx1
	fbgFxy9T9PYc7QzhwzVQhEnkCLg/OW355dlumw8HNW2j2OXlsyqnElIJfIyHsWEw
	n6pEGEzyDgchLP7DWeDmU1fxG4fF+cvV+3OI54FdQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
	:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=OrdItY9n
	h4ZeT919gc2fLCu3VOo=; b=uUCCcbNcsOB+zX4gu3bl9HFMlpxLLl29H+/4MuGL
	HdF6aAAnu4to7IeTtPNZ004O6M3QN3v05yBcvZbcBuz5mnv9GCFjspI/43gfeiT+
	3hzS2zN+/eIlzCy1pUWJ9KLe+/GRq7xuow3uioDi99qLr0/nV0zTxdh96u/RfBs2
	v6c=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wg0-f41.google.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.189.240 with SMTP id gl16mr1423583wjc.119.1415867927382; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:38:47 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <BLU404-EAS140FCBE28CEE31BC7296E69D9810@phx.gbl>
References: <BLU404-EAS140FCBE28CEE31BC7296E69D9810 AT phx DOT gbl>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 09:38:47 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEhDDbDt7o4=Wm_uJf8qpV0DkBTZdCKg_7txhFXQ1mKRhLrN=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Notable performance improvement in 64-bit build
From: Csaba Raduly <rcsaba AT gmail DOT com>
To: cygwin list <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Ivan,

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 12:52 AM, Ivan Todoroski wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm just curious, has there been any special focus on performance
> improvements in the 64-bit version compared to 32-bit?
>
> I'm asking because I recently upgraded from 32-bit to 64-bit Cygwin, and I
> noticed that my bash prompt would show up noticeably quicker when I opened a
> new Cygwin shell (I have a rather complicated ~/.profile script, so the
> delay is actually visible to the eye).

Do you have the same .profile in both installations?
Do you have the same bash-completion package (often the most
time-consuming part of bash startup)?

Csaba
-- 
GCS a+ e++ d- C++ ULS$ L+$ !E- W++ P+++$ w++$ tv+ b++ DI D++ 5++
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
"Ok, it boots. Which means it must be bug-free and perfect. " -- Linus Torvalds
"People disagree with me. I just ignore them." -- Linus Torvalds

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple