X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=lyXdZGXwgowAAjHMVdj/DqOxuW1txywcdStGFRc9KyjpnnTTMq8AY K6Ihy9XKBFqJ5nA3MQ2lCaxxV1S/xyqTyIP42+Z7Vnza1qQ7SwrW2H4wX1acTPFp jp7PDAwP1hOrjKPzRxy4aFuJEY/AwacgTu9Pc4avfbqOHLzD91GvU0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to :subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=R h7WQYbsVXTDH5ntUbAdgDI2wU8=; b=dIElK62EVoUpT11AJmo/gYz0HXeragUiw 8Xm16ouwMRLBM8JVydgBZeUVwD3MWAqznc4fICG8II3VfUw0ILYIej3Lq2ay1nbl 33VBGFYOK4EdVo21MRC8pmg4QkzHUHqsabi6fjFih51dItfo5k4Oy0Hii1/Z9UwE Me8ElFuQ+8= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_MXURI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: omr-m06.mx.aol.com Message-ID: <545BD768.8040509@aol.com> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 15:17:44 -0500 From: Tim Prince Reply-To: tprince AT computer DOT org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: gfortran 4.9.2-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1add8e545bd76a6f58 X-AOL-IP: 65.26.156.163 My own benchmarks work fine (gcc/g++ also). In John Campbell's test, among 5 run-time failures, there is (twice): Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference. Backtrace for this error: 1 [main] profile_omp 5664 fixup_mmaps_after_fork: ReadProcessMemory failed for MAP_PRIVATE address 0x6FE5FC60000, Win32 error 998 357 [main] profile_omp 5664 C:\users\tim\tim\tim\src\campbell\Profile_send_3 Nov14\profile_omp.exe: *** fatal error in forked process - recreate_mmaps_after_fork_failed 690131 [main] profile_omp 5664 cygwin_exception::open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to profile_omp.exe.stackdump 3 [main] profile_omp 4644 fork: child -1 - forked process 5664 died unexpectedly, retry 0, exit code 0x100, errno 11 28628 [main] profile_omp 4644 cygwin_exception::open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to profile_omp.exe.stackdump In spite of the remaining failures, it looks like progress. As I'm lazy, I'll continue using gcc-5.0 trunk builds unless there is interest (suggestion what should be done) in this one. I guess this 4.9.2-1 is more aggressive with build options than I've been able to make work. -- Tim Prince -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple