X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=
	default; b=v3If0jC2hIrtHzTeWmPBI1xTdZb5zhyMwITlxbdJYzvc29sNFtS6j
	WyBHBAdeRy8lTUqxAbUh8ndNUzdHadITz9kmK4MOuIBgFgjbsAfiyav0ZjT0j2Wh
	BGD9rqAm5SnfCKbIhtIx4P1NA0NCmnfofqVV36FCSPoV6DmLER/Iq8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to
	:references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default;
	 bh=rwLcteRUnsqLr9ICw1TY83l/688=; b=CvQGDruUV+c5i1bPgZEwCnY7P6RZ
	vHV/jOs+fAHUSZmj3mQD23y1LpInTXlbiaL7Xb7kIeoYRIXjxlkGSv8r5LD/AkCL
	u+LhSbKFtsqHaO2JSiIGIJVwnHlSU3rXhAHJXw0WIAzFqM2fb9mbOhzv5TiOK9qr
	IO9Ay3MsbsNyUy0=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:33:11 +0100
From: Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc packaging bug?
Message-ID: <20141104093311.GL28636@calimero.vinschen.de>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <5457F7C2 DOT 9090204 AT cornell DOT edu> <CAJ1FpuNbx-CZDOd2a0WPV2F5hfWQtbNAV7AFUuD1CPXBefL6Yw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Z9t8O/5YJLB6LEUl"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJ1FpuNbx-CZDOd2a0WPV2F5hfWQtbNAV7AFUuD1CPXBefL6Yw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

--Z9t8O/5YJLB6LEUl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Nov  3 17:48, Doug Henderson wrote:
> On 3 November 2014 14:46, Ken Brown wrote:
> > The setup.hint files for gcc and its subpackages now say
> >
> > curr: 4.8.3-2
> > prev: 4.8.3-3
> > test: 4.9.2-1
>=20
> Setup-x86_64.exe is reporting that cygwin-devel is a dependency of
> gcc-core now. Is this an intentional change?

Yes.  Right now the cygwin-devel package is an empty package, but the
next release will split the cygwin package into a base package and a
devel package.


Corinna

--=20
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer                 cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat

--Z9t8O/5YJLB6LEUl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=2cmg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Z9t8O/5YJLB6LEUl--