X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=W8alhoA JZOOeaJnu9VEu5GszFBQBgK3Zvv/ggMhlW3aGSrt6L6e4HhhlnWwkdmhej4oI19N LsaMKsTmLRmkDBAk+Mpju2LoFbxVR4bnyiR00cmIXaD87dAPJtg9wAw5SDTiF4zQ iO9JdeHfblQ+sZihOv2FKY+Fo2yiy+ONn1+U= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=default; bh=O/em1tGsW+n++ pwFSATtWuLROXk=; b=w/z7DbE0FX75n8JbTblg3Oct7QOB1ULi9sPKLOPeqAYId /md0l0RJTJ2A503QBqx+mUR+4UpTug4vlCgtmYmnK7Sg5icww52lncTDoIyu01Of fyaeDtPlOAfiigcANlrK5dI2dz2jqStyNZdBMEmttWSKkpxuVUe5Cspr0VTHLw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM,HK_RANDOM_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-vc0-f171.google.com X-Received: by 10.221.5.65 with SMTP id of1mr25001777vcb.6.1415062116336; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 16:48:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5457F7C2.9090204@cornell.edu> References: <5457F7C2 DOT 9090204 AT cornell DOT edu> From: Doug Henderson Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:48:16 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: gcc packaging bug? To: cygwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes On 3 November 2014 14:46, Ken Brown wrote: > The setup.hint files for gcc and its subpackages now say > > curr: 4.8.3-2 > prev: 4.8.3-3 > test: 4.9.2-1 Setup-x86_64.exe is reporting that cygwin-devel is a dependency of gcc-core now. Is this an intentional change? Doug -- Doug Henderson, Calgary, Alberta, Canada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple