X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=o1UmQsIXdK5233DOKlGTqPqe7h2lO 8AAB5Ic+kix0t3iqpxnYxGUhH9pT5C8x61+cbnVQYYe+lb0VUIToCOGth+hpr02X u5jE/9H/iB9C0ox8KkRJlHn/Bg+dnu/okGKoU2Ycd1RBFVHdGy8ZuYRIjpK+te79 v06a1AozF5Lzpg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; s=default; bh=q4zxQz0+FBa4Qj+R3O1lvMG5VCE=; b=r70 8S5TkfKhu5vkc2iUd/my8XNC//b7SMMuGdhhnopXY/RRjSkDBgGmjReaRnoKkxQ/ Wa/uRqT5dWZSdrIkG3CPPUqZMado6ayvOS74U2476Bugh23KBnWKG9diSE0ZhSIi jMdxvhw+fXjNCIqchu8IgJ93CuOLzBxKfDEIxEBw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com From: "Habermann, Dave (DA)" To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.33-0.1 Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 13:41:49 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20141022135424 DOT GB18857 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20141027212637 DOT GZ20607 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> In-Reply-To: <20141027212637.GZ20607@calimero.vinschen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: 046-CH1MMR1-007.046d.mgd.msft.net X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:65.52.44.158;CTRY:US;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(428002)(24454002)(199003)(189002)(13464003)(377454003)(5423002)(64706001)(101416001)(2501002)(21056001)(66066001)(106466001)(81156004)(15395725005)(20776003)(47776003)(120916001)(85306004)(107046002)(93886004)(76482002)(22746005)(22756005)(107886001)(97736003)(2351001)(77096002)(84676001)(95666004)(104016003)(110136001)(105586002)(106116001)(15975445006)(68736004)(55846006)(4396001)(31966008)(19580405001)(85852003)(87936001)(2656002)(86146001)(92726001)(92566001)(76176999)(23676002)(46102003)(69596002)(33656002)(80022003)(15202345003)(551544002)(50986999)(6806004)(50466002)(86362001)(54356999)(19580395003)(44976005)(79686002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:BY2PR0101MB0870;H:mail.bsnconnect.com;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en; X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: BL2FFO11FD019.protection.gbl X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: BL2FFO11FD019.protection.gbl X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR0101MB0870; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0378F1E47A Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: dow.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is 65.52.44.158) smtp.mailfrom=DAHabermann AT dow DOT com; X-OriginatorOrg: dow.com X-IsSubscribed: yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id s9SDghFl017982 -----Original Message----- From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com] On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 5:27 PM To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.33-0.1 On Oct 27 18:35, Habermann, Dave (DA) wrote: >> Question: In the documentation you indicate that "If cygserver is >> running it will provide passwd and group entry caching for all >> processes in every Cygwin process tree started after cygserver." >> Normally I have several processes (specifically sshd, cygserver, cron >> and httpd2) automatically start up as services when my system boots >> up, and I have not specified the order. Would it now be desirable to >> have cygserver starting up first, followed by the others? If so, what >> would be the preferred way to create such a dependency/startup timing? >> Would a service dependency be sufficient? >Now that you mention it... yes, a service dependency might be helpful. >Unfortunately it's tricky to automate this. Is it possible to add >service deps after having installed a service? According to http://serverfault.com/questions/24821/how-to-add-dependency-on-a-windows-service-after-the-service-is-installed it is possible to add a dependency to an already existing service. I agree it would be hard to automate in the install scripts, as one would have to either ask the user about their intent to run other services or rely that they configured cygserver first and then check to see if it has been already configured to determine if a dependency should be created. I would think that some instructions in the docs near the statement mentioned above would be more than sufficient, since this is a "fine tuning" sort of thing.