X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=oBtOiq PuG8fFEg4TnjZRfHfX8b+sXDcymN58zKbNjp0hslTgzDWogtJHvS+G9jt9u4wzdC Bfvk6BPFowLv/D1DsaYM1pXSuWvxzzL10bW25ri1SfdGZJQQv4BT4dQGgpmcpslZ /+RDEk8yC/G4e5mhlsJjvn9YUOqPKBXRRpCZ4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=default; bh=25s6/IoRn3iM B2vneUIhzhRU/3Y=; b=Kev9xp47Ih/b1L+JJehqaMsu4PJ0/go6dfvtlwDqWLV8 eZ+WjTDPu9wMY1+O/trccZ7mZZDgJmomt7JoUkKVngp02+Xr2FQxH4syY2n687MV vjtTriIDLvlx3TBfQbV2+cKe2M7P/GB9iB5PJiDFfWJMZCxolxx/9wwf4rSMZHw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Message-ID: <544A6FB4.5070004@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 09:26:44 -0600 From: Eric Blake User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Why can't run.exe execute a shebang script directly? References: <1414155946 DOT 62587 DOT YahooMailNeo AT web162803 DOT mail DOT bf1 DOT yahoo DOT com> <20141024135339 DOT GM20607 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <1414163944 DOT 58941 DOT YahooMailNeo AT web162803 DOT mail DOT bf1 DOT yahoo DOT com> In-Reply-To: <1414163944.58941.YahooMailNeo@web162803.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> OpenPGP: url=http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E75pFVdeEOcC78Il5KuTGIH2b0obLQ6Fi" X-IsSubscribed: yes --E75pFVdeEOcC78Il5KuTGIH2b0obLQ6Fi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10/24/2014 09:19 AM, John Wiersba wrote: > I thought that all (or virtually all) cygwin-supplied programs that start= =20 > other programs use the cygwin1.dll execve(2) emulation to start them, bec= ause=20 > the execve emulation can be used to start *both* cygwin programs and wind= ows=20 > native programs. Or at least it seems that way to me. >=20 > Is there be in drawback to having run.exe start its target program using > the execve emulation in cygwin1.dll, rather than using a Windows call to > start the target executable? run.exe is special. In order to hide consoles, it MUST use native windows API instead of cygwin1.dll calls. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org --E75pFVdeEOcC78Il5KuTGIH2b0obLQ6Fi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUSm+0AAoJEKeha0olJ0Nq80EH/i66JIrcILFoM3DRGWH+3Gfk byIyZHppkydWJIPCThdeaKBWHRRymFFfiCSht764ag+ZqcV6+e90PcS2bX0LzJby mS6zXhPPD8/uubycAtFAFonP23fLD5G4J+sj3zG0xsA29D/Mj1DGquhZx4MM7GbI 5l1Gz9W0genkdoPVNdDZp7hy2Y2mehkFejBnmf3Tq/PuI/B8UXoYwETf9xH6jedx sxzZBhZX7kDgo9nxLlBT/vJv/IYjGZ3tqXMumWewZ0dDItZDe6tyE0NCRTzrdjiY 5Hl50yoI3ohRMSsJkjyL8iiITN8pF9Ks7+pEVW9xeiXk5OWYLtArF3JtyKlGSOc= =L9K1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E75pFVdeEOcC78Il5KuTGIH2b0obLQ6Fi--