X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=fa/ k7mpwPkVxZW1OphIseQ0FedA3A4hAX2bUGxTKZU3Filx9at573H88WwvZRDG7Ljo 5T6v5HBSqvdJcXYVZScgyNtfr4opn4OiwGlIoClFSnuRh6s1ZpCt5qFEICHmDcFU nBAOAs3iZUQJShuucayouhci5VH1t49KxGqPyy9Q= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=zKVOOUpq1 K3s1S18/HgwoqTZz00=; b=yIulqHslSU+5PdPSDu1TTWcS3qr15j5TPnmszUOtk aXVtEja8UM3lxgbFzhslpv79912b0Z5QZJP1Zp3+SM5K3Xg8gEs+AkV9pKbrNhAJ vgPm+KN7bRP/YlXDz85VmkhcmGf7UcKRODQcDmk0nCn+YlC+TXGqkBsoHW66sgIY qk= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f181.google.com X-Received: by 10.180.73.18 with SMTP id h18mr20625953wiv.34.1413811220692; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 06:20:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <54450C0A.6050705@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:20:10 +0200 From: Marco Atzeri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Subject: Tester for openblas needed Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Hi, before making an official cygwin package for OpenBlas (fast Blas) http://www.openblas.net/ I would like some test from potential users. The dynamic library is multicore, so it should work on "all" processors, but unfortunately I can only test on my dual Core i5-3320M. On this system the speedup of basic BLAS operation is notable. 1000x1000x1000 DGEMM tests give for x86_64 architecture 0.818047 s 2444.847301 MFLOPS x86_64 netlib reference 0.055000 s 36363.636364 MFLOPS x86_64 openblas 2.12 for i686 architecture 0.825001 s 2424.239486 MFLOPS i686 netlib reference 0.095001 s 21052.409975 MFLOPS i686 openblas 2.12 Libraries are available on: http://matzeri.altervista.org/x86/openblas/libopenblas_dynamic/ http://matzeri.altervista.org/x86_64/openblas/libopenblas_dynamic/ To use them is enough to copy the cygblas-0.dll in any path directory before "/usr/lib/lapack" where the lapack one is located. On http://matzeri.altervista.org/works/openblas/ there is also a DGEMM test routine, if you have no other benchmark. Thanks in advance Marco -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple