X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:content-type:to:date:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id; q=dns; s=default; b= ZU80aBz/fd5E0YF3eJ0lpBeIGQqjSMQAIfx8Ih+TDSMkuUum0Kq0QVyVGbES4KJq tZRIu4i1iux4K+A/80sdmAQjenXhyHqOYZ+bqMKFtU4uBWotIkc/KNktf3aQYgga dDQc/Rqf2JVJUpQmpQsqaWLg1WmOswRvbiv8j2C92nI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:content-type:to:date:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:from:message-id; s=default; bh=6pHaJR o60mS0lQZbPEnyXXKyD0o=; b=M+s9GbdBy/VrbyaP3WAMTcvUpBKYkOyyQ3+hE8 Q0F4WP0nGEzpmdnwA5lyznURgLsR0dQVOS+fUjYjM2IHCcVE0yUPI/MA8i3CaS/C 1Kt+6OFjWakjQwYA5mQ5R9LLAi4ym7sk7saSZHzHuOZxQEa0fP9CWrA/NgWI2xnw QjpBk= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mailout.ish.de X-Spam-Score: 0.001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 22:02:33 +0100 Subject: mintty: WINCH-signal to child MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Helmut Karlowski" Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.16 (Win32) X-IsSubscribed: yes When I run for example an editor from a shell in a mintty-window and change the window-size the editor is informed by a WINCH-signal. That is good. But the shell it was started from does not know about the change, so after exiting the editor the shell uses the old size. Could mintty send a WINCH-signal to its direct child (-pgrp) perhaps? Of course for more complicated situations it could be difficult to inform all involved processes when not all have the same pgrp, but it would be better than nothing. Or do I miss something? -Helmut -- -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple