X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Hi0InHolIwc8vJna+Jv6oAeaOAXFaxJ7q5pe0NA379Q x+xTRuDT9rsvVLCw9YMRQDf4MRsLDfCtnDSJKMwlHyZSXftQhyNhpfAA92Ay6tKS CIkZlhtm+liYg99AdZIUpDbG/pLl+LV7jN14oSOJFWn16XN4xBE8qcZRkiHqr0Z4 = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=ttO/A8WzjmGfLxSs1TY/z8uRp/8=; b=sD1rpVvP/VnI8GpN5 yCaFi7W2bqYbN6iBbJxIFrtEqzQ68uOqk2/2jYO2BaXsww2WtLczW0qjD6Fi4b4h Jfz5PnzHFUMKjulPzjwUYXTauzxWcvw/ikFpH2yHkT8sqNWAiB40EaKyHyL4TTVG RiyUYp2aiRWTdESTS9/1Dqfn4M= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Message-ID: <54356D0A.9020406@cygwin.com> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 11:57:46 -0500 From: Yaakov Selkowitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Packages up for adoption References: <541C4417 DOT 40806 AT etr-usa DOT com> In-Reply-To: <541C4417.40806@etr-usa.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2014-09-19 09:56, Warren Young wrote: > 3. Other than time, is there a reason you haven't released R50b yet? It > seems to pass its own test suite here, so if I adopt it, I'm committing > to releasing R50b shortly, unless there are traps I haven't discovered. I suspect it was just a matter of time (or lack thereof). > 4. What do you think about replacing mksh in Cygwin with ksh93? It > seems OSS-enough to make Red Hat happy. [2] We could ship both and just not have a ksh -> mksh symlink. But if you do decide to build ksh93, then please be sure to add the Fedora patchset, as there are a lot of fixes there. Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple