X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; q=dns; s=default; b=NrMLLuVPWrGEUwSQfCNAXRVSwTVuA TJ/yJQjAkxzDejbHI7/wOZ+AgHNiIQPhnrbES/HLCeUDVaWDyN+VLjl0VkICkOLw VaHpQPG4g48eMgzBvAIJ+6qJe+N0Z6cBM+fMHnAIOEa89Zmg5RIPCNse8iWyeOwd 8iUubsNndlvoYU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; s=default; bh=gBX9Zy3eMcLNGTz3jLV8uj24sfU=; b=DJL gBjsajx5+ItyZpLRknhjnv/RMZO5gna+DK+6O33E/QqpwG+36KyCn5JY+UvgJWbw FNYc/MNxqhBE2a7jKbKZgvNBwPg/hszSOTFNB78UZqa36sV8e/qpmmEEfVlParbN GNXQcHVSG/LtLml8EueP8LNCKXkDKEunPDPdRey4= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MIME_BASE64_BLANKS,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: nihtlsxway.hub.nih.gov X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhgKAF3iKVScKEe0/2dsb2JhbABggw+BLoJ9y0uDIQIZdxYBA28JhAMBAQEDARIREVUCAQgNCwICBiACAgIdExUQAgQbEweIFAifA4oqlgIBF4EsjjARFiKCeDaBHQWPS4IaA5M7jWKDY4F0QIECAQEB X-IPAS-Result: AhgKAF3iKVScKEe0/2dsb2JhbABggw+BLoJ9y0uDIQIZdxYBA28JhAMBAQEDARIREVUCAQgNCwICBiACAgIdExUQAgQbEweIFAifA4oqlgIBF4EsjjARFiKCeDaBHQWPS4IaA5M7jWKDY4F0QIECAQEB From: "Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]" To: "cygwin AT cygwin DOT com" Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.1.13-6 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 22:52:41 +0000 Message-ID: <6CF2FC1279D0844C9357664DC5A08BA20EC16178@MLBXV06.nih.gov> References: <6CF2FC1279D0844C9357664DC5A08BA20EC15E2A AT MLBXV06 DOT nih DOT gov> <5429CF29 DOT 8030205 AT redhat DOT com> In-Reply-To: <5429CF29.8030205@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id s8TMqwfl019433 Eric Blake sent the following at Monday, September 29, 2014 5:29 PM >On 09/29/2014 03:23 PM, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: >> Eric Blake (cygwin) sent the following at Saturday, September 27, 2014 2:14 AM >> >> Using the new version of bash, two scripts that I use have both started giving me >> the following error message(s). >> >> /usr/bin/bash: error importing function definition for `BASH_FUNC_make-log' >> /usr/bin/bash: error importing function definition for `BASH_FUNC_configure-log' >> /usr/bin/bash: error importing function definition for `BASH_FUNC_prt-alias' > >These functions contain '-' in their name; that's a limitation of >the downstream forked patch I applied early to get 4.1.13-6 out the >door. Upstream solved it in a nicer manner, so you can once again have >functions with '-' in the name. Please try again with the just-released >4.1.14-7. I understand that to mean that 4.1.14-7 will be able to export functions with '-' in their names. >> I was able to get rid of this by commenting out the functions (make-log, >> configure-log, and prt-alias) and removing them from the list of functions being >> set and exported in ~/.bashrc. I rarely use these functions and would be unlikely >> to use them in a subshell so that works as a solution. > >Having the function wasn't the problem, it was exporting it. You can >still have the function even in 4.1.13-6, as long as you don't export >it. Changed to underscores. All is well. >> Another thing happening is that some scripts are now sometimes giving this error >> message, but only when the problem function exports are not being exported. >> >> Segmentation fault (core dumped) > >Umm, that's not good. Can you please come up with a minimal reproduction >formula? Which program is dumping core? Bash, or something else? Is it >due to trying to execute the function that was not imported? It wasn't reproducible, but a while after I sent my email various windows stopped responding, I couldn't close them, the machine wouldn't shut down, and ended up unplugging the machine so I could reboot. Let's assume that something unrelated to cygwin was going on. >> Any hints about what I should look for to make export of my bash shell functions >> reliable? > >Upgrading to the next version :) Will do! Thanks for all your help. - Barry Disclaimer: Statements made herein are not made on behalf of NIAID.