X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject:message-id; q= dns; s=default; b=FqGYYVce4rNK/H7K8R1HqWEfEraYduTVUKVCKVDH/cl+FA CuekHwngD73X4V4E30K2A/jJ6IELNKJrSapgspYcd7HNfOv8hxlwWksgBmTC1P1X 4X9vWgviJXR3YkgAjrK6+v0iFpnVUmA36Q7Fa4bAnVy29kD1wh0lIEC1ekhlw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:date:from:to:subject:message-id; s= default; bh=F8aG12jOFLvfsNzJCy+t1gIECck=; b=ceJ3m8Ew8CO91mjH9Sj7 mkXAOQpD/FZ5MO7pxQVAkPpfqiV7pvACbrA9+8VI98kWLIyufVTWyC/coBTaYxu3 2ku4TldNrYHE4hu0lHKco54t5aEjnmmhHnAFez1Dc+CJwHknE7q5vucQmH2X/Bi+ Ev3GwQRSVeQhv+FJeR+uXjo= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtprelay02.ispgateway.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:23:44 +0200 From: Markus Hoenicka To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Fwd: Re: Strange gdb backtraces on 64-bit Cygwin Message-ID: X-Sender: markus DOT hoenicka AT mhoenicka DOT de User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail X-Df-Sender: bWFya3VzLmhvZW5pY2thQG1ob2VuaWNrYS5kZQ== X-IsSubscribed: yes At 2014-09-23 14:31, Ken Brown was heard to say: > > So I think it's pretty clear that the strange backtrace I observed > with gdb-7.6.50-4 on 64-bit Cygwin was indeed due to a deficiency in > gdb. > > I hope that people who have been experiencing emacs crashes with > "impossible" backtraces will update to gdb-7.8-2. > Hi, I might be dense somehow, but the two emacs crashes with said "impossible" backtraces that I reported yesterday [1][2] were observed with the gdb version that you recommend: $ gdb -version GNU gdb (GDB) 7.8 [...] $ cygcheck -f /usr/bin/gdb gdb-7.8-2 Are you sure this is all it takes to get sane backtraces? regards, Markus [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2014-09/msg00697.html [2] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2014-09/msg00715.html -- Markus Hoenicka http://www.mhoenicka.de AQ score 38 -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple