X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=y30Twwx/AH8MnRiCbW6yqiTNaHARlPU6tVsH9lmEdlx VUQQehyGdIv94G9M+Xh1sKP5erB6o6OggpdIfgwA0dBjlLl75mMhMg6giEAyhkqt tZed0EwXI+mEMMBm3Av/ixx/7Fwq1+Dqd2OwIBt1prRRj+DcW3N6SLR4u3Z97xMg = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=ZY6o7j0rQamLQ1TuRy9upMyxh9k=; b=jn2UjCSTVIn7CKC+g dQRsKr5CtoBHpo/tNXChJympzqaQ+1IAICd1r43KVScAgF2McL1vehJrbAMjHxkg YxD7ztPOfC9Klo4T2QQlsgElxNxL3Mq0tlGDS4NJPKJtqPO/fhi2fPW7vvwTSN78 dUAz9gGP28rmP3NUC87S7ZNF+g= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: etr-usa.com Message-ID: <541C4417.40806@etr-usa.com> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:56:23 -0600 From: Warren Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cygwin-L Subject: Re: Packages up for adoption References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 9/18/2014 11:44, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > > I'm looking for any volunteers to take over > maintainership of the following packages: mksh I'm also somewhat interested in this one. I've never been a Korn shell user, but I recently learned about mksh and its place in Bourne family shell history. [1] Only a ksh93 package would be more valuable, but until someone adopts that, I think mksh still has a place in Cygwin. More questions: 1. Where is the source package? setup.exe doesn't offer it. 2. Have you cygported it yet? I built it from the official tarball, and while it has a primitive non-Autotools build system, it looks compatible with cygport. 3. Other than time, is there a reason you haven't released R50b yet? It seems to pass its own test suite here, so if I adopt it, I'm committing to releasing R50b shortly, unless there are traps I haven't discovered. 4. What do you think about replacing mksh in Cygwin with ksh93? It seems OSS-enough to make Red Hat happy. [2] [1]: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/145522/#145524 [2]: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ksh -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple