X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=yk4jJInWA9PKq7t2pnn19RInzI6HRRd10N+4jyeLHd8PCoiDX7UTc 1QE2baxB/S0dAlm/5tsr3vrE4XrtLzNhPcIABRYfO6E+a92hGPVvYbfI1Uyo8uun VwTAjbI9MZrURhU0PBjt2bC5sOqf1A/POhYjc91TYMIXcl1LjgxN3w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=60HD+rsTuQMhQ5KbXjLZzLFzqek=; b=ofwjts/sEzzvdRKhxfBKc3Vn0WYc HMLEp9w/9h3kY+4h99o1VR3aHya++7HdduSoh9fBWLR0/tcnbS/kXYDn8YkF1Eub rZqLjZ0/elgyK3/othuvnpXiIV2e4ql7ARS4WtHjJw6ayQjIFaIdFiASLwGIMIvQ O3QCqNLN5gAXLuM= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: Paul Subject: Re: Replicate packages from 32-bit machine on 64-bit machine Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 15:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <1109698188 DOT 20140818042530 AT yandex DOT ru> <53F21480 DOT 6070401 AT cygwin DOT com> <20140822221047 DOT GB22231 AT dinwoodie DOT org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-IsSubscribed: yes Larry Hall (Cygwin cygwin.com> writes: > Well, right. There's no way to automatically map all 32-bit > packages to their 64-bit counterparts, particularly because there > isn't always a 64-bit package to map to. What I was suggesting was > a method you could use to make a first pass at the 64-bit packages > that you want to download. It won't be perfect but it would be a > quicker alternative to doing this all manually. But if 64-bit > packages are what you're looking for, you definitely have to go > through some process for this once. After that, you can employ the > same technique to replicate your 64-bit installation elsewhere. Adam Dinwoodie dinwoodie.org> writes: > I don't think there's any perfect solution to this problem -- as > noted there just isn't a perfect mapping between 32-bit and 64-bit > packages -- but it occurs to me that you could install the > cygcheck-dep package and call `cygcheck-dep -il`. That'll give you > a list of just the "leaves" in the tree of installed packages and > their dependencies, which may be a better starting point for what > packages you need to install on your new system, since you'll > automatically get all their dependencies. Larry, Adam, Thanks for the follow up. I don't want to match packages from the bottom up because some of them are automatically chosen based on dependencies. I ended up just going through manually choosing packages. Wasn't all that bad. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple