X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=IWJ+V3VItwwxbzGm
	XmyuJwc80yAzm1DMTZwCMtw+1NDIHg8CrZ8/VFxuVQoZv07uAB7KZ7qvU5CoAXVU
	yM9GKiOWxOni76wd7S+6LZR+quvFePmtcVn4KTpzgVbNR7ba1hd4MYFqEfhiQPvt
	W217Iu24+ng4lV0DJigtYZJa0yw=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=46yEYEOizbfuw5xu/Dla8n
	43euQ=; b=VaikLcuUDozkqfk5kFVp2Dn4T2uE+0wzSjQbrYToj3lR3JmLBgAoKK
	U8Lf0S2dEePenCvTlEc/7LFbuO470/kAzcXiJBEyr4jJ/r4G31JR0bGQZuygpl4C
	aPSDVz2J0qoagHsiKqGpTt/anP3UtWAXFOYVwHAdcR1Y7Ky8lRf5w=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,UNSUBSCRIBE_BODY autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: vms173019pub.verizon.net
Message-id: <53F7937B.5040404@cygwin.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 15:01:15 -0400
From: "Larry Hall (Cygwin)" <reply-to-list-only-lh AT cygwin DOT com>
Reply-to: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.7.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: Replicate packages from 32-bit machine on 64-bit machine
References: <loom DOT 20140817T083657-868 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <1109698188 DOT 20140818042530 AT yandex DOT ru> <loom DOT 20140818T162457-896 AT post DOT gmane DOT org> <53F21480 DOT 6070401 AT cygwin DOT com> <loom DOT 20140822T201659-254 AT post DOT gmane DOT org>
In-reply-to: <loom.20140822T201659-254@post.gmane.org>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 08/22/2014 02:17 PM, Paul.Domaskis wrote:
> Larry Hall (Cygwin <reply-to-list-only-lh <at> cygwin.com> writes:
>> On 08/18/2014 10:30 AM, Paul wrote:
>>> Andrey Repin <anrdaemon <at> yandex.ru> writes:
>>>> When I wanted to replicate my cygwin installation from a 32-bit
>>>> machine to another 32-bit machine, it was straightforward.  I would
>>>> simply reinstall all installed packages, but have the downloaded
>>>> packages got to a folder which I then burn to CD.
>>>>
>>>> However, my next machine is a 64-bit machine.  So I have to use the
>>>> 64-bit setup.  Is there an almost-as-painless way to replicate the
>>>> 64-bit version of the packages that I have installed on my 32-bit
>>>> machine?
>>>
>>> You contradicting yourself. 64-bit packages are entirely different
>>> files than 32-bit packages.
>> Yes, I understand.  I was referring to the 64-bit versions of my
>> 32-bit packages.  It took quite some period of discovery to determine
>> my operational needs and the packages required. I'm hoping to avoid
>> that re-experiencing that.
>>
>> You shouldn't have allot of trouble matching the 64-bit version of any
>> package with the 32-bit version.  Assuming there is a 64-bit version of
>> the package you want, package names are typically very similar between
>> the two architectures.
>
> Understood, Larry.  It's just that there are so many packages, and I
> don't want to manually find all the matching packages.  Before, if I
> wanted to replicate a cygwin install on another machine, I just
> reinstalled all my packages, but saved the packages to a folder that I
> could write to disc.  I can't do that if I want to replicate my
> packages as 62-bit versions.

Well, right.  There's no way to automatically map all 32-bit packages
to their 64-bit counterparts, particularly because there isn't always a
64-bit package to map to.  What I was suggesting was a method you could
use to make a first pass at the 64-bit packages that you want to download.
It won't be perfect but it would be a quicker alternative to doing this
all manually.  But if 64-bit packages are what you're looking for, you
definitely have to go through some process for this once.  After that,
you can employ the same technique to replicate your 64-bit installation
elsewhere.


-- 
Larry

_____________________________________________________________________

A: Yes.
 > Q: Are you sure?
 >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
 >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple