X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=m8 RNny/D/oZ7KQ0VrAON79aSF8cvocLO/BumIxvtUHODlGqCGYx8vULkpvQ6exj38Z wdcLw7MyzlnCrUUxeKoz0RgendSMwO2qzruSMDgfC8asJf1kLqWLR2RpcY049EEM YztkWinpso9BmBgVRPl6lOc7AG+POVp3+ekIXY5os= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s=default; bh=VZPRkCVR aLe90NXbfhSq6AwsYmg=; b=WYnzAjyLicKedHDCszalqaYEyE33BPap4Y8I+/8V NKhl8EF3bIUYmbw4TjAWYU++8kd6z75x9LiZJs3rgi/7cEesoXmVabuasnTCXCMQ esdW5ZORzknoXwzzfJlcoG0bck7obpD3rGlzGj6XmU9Pb5STXjYBi110qVGYkjJ6 wWI= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,FREEMAIL_REPLY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wg0-f43.google.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.221.67 with SMTP id qc3mr25936722wic.83.1408168119178; Fri, 15 Aug 2014 22:48:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <496613926.20140816040503@yandex.ru> References: <53EE1737 DOT 7080306 AT cygwin DOT com> <496613926 DOT 20140816040503 AT yandex DOT ru> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 01:48:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: man-db-2.6.7-2 From: Michael DePaulo To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-IsSubscribed: yes On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Michael DePaulo! > >>>>> >>>>> This release removes the cache database generation from the postinstall >>>>> step >>>>> due to its often excessive length. Users will need to manage the >>>>> database >>>>> themselves with mandb(1) in order to use whatis/apropos(1). >>>> >>>> >>>> IMHO, this sounds like a serious decrease in Cygwin's usability. >>>> >>>> How do Linux distributions handle this? Linux distros install many >>>> more packages by default, so doesn't their cache database generation >>>> typically take much longer? >>> >>> >>> Exactly why they don't seem to do it during postinstall either. For >>> example, in Fedora this is handled by a cron job. A future release may add >>> that functionality, but it is clear that postinstall is the wrong place for >>> it. > >> I disagree, but I need to read more about the subject in order to have >> a well-informed opinion. > > The TL;DR version of the issue is that compilation of database is slow and > prone to fail, plus the database should be re-indexed each time a page is > added, removed or changed. > If Cygwin do this only at man-db postinstall, the database WILL go out of > reality pretty soon. Understood. I was thinking that the db was generated every time you updated or installed packages. That's how Debian and its derivatives do keep it up-to-date. (Actually, they only run mandb if 1 or more of the updated/installed packages have manpage. It's handled by their "dpkg trigger" feature.) Reference: http://askubuntu.com/questions/178773/is-there-a-way-to-see-what-exactly-the-processing-triggers-does-per-package-ba >>>> Also, should documentation (or perhaps the info a user sees when they >>>> start Cygwin for the 1st time) be updated? >>> >>> >>> How so? >>> >>> Yaakov > >> Consider the example of where I work. After I install the corporate IT >> department's SCCM "package"/"script" for Cygwin (1.7.16, last updated >> August 2012), I am greeted by this message every time I start the >> Cygwin Terminal: >> ---- >> Your group is currently "mkpasswd". This indicates that your >> gid is not in /etc/group and your uid is not in /etc/passwd. > > This is about to change in a short while. > >> I am not suggesting that users see a mandb message every time they >> launch cygwin. > > This could be resolved in a more graceful way. I.e. motd/fortune/etc. > >> But I am suggesting that that users see it when they >> 1st launch cygwin. They already see this message: >> ---- >> Copying skeleton files. >> These files are for the users to personalise their cygwin experience. > >> They will never be overwritten nor automatically updated. > > Users will only see this message, if the $HOME directory is created anew. > I, for one, do not see a reason to keep Cygwin users' $HOMEs separate from a > system %USERPROFILE%. > >> Also, users who are particularly reliant on the apropos command >> probably don't know about running the mandb command. It's analogous to >> users launching the Windows "Help and Support" Center, but its search >> bar returning 0 results they haven't run another utility 1st. > > That's an issue worth resolving. We just need to find a way to do it in a > non-abusive fashion. > > > -- > WBR, > Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru) 16.08.2014, <03:57> > > Sorry for my terrible english... > Thanks, I have a much better understanding of the situation now. I agree that there is no simple solution. -Mike -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple