X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=Es8fIEmBfJCxevKR ibb0zY7z23bj1qdl6olpL+mzpatjOfo0UQfcOKoU56ux/wSNu6bgczeRVpU+myBg q5EB1kd+WEH6eZ2sr6rPjXg6RUvTSQiTvrQyI8Iuqb7FAccBaHUaSdxNKELOP1/M aUzKgDBJv1WmYR66Aw0bzdVpUqY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:reply-to:message-id:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=K45SOsQ7jzOjQ8aLdFsqLS mbZcE=; b=swvRzj8CqYB25w+AcD1In/u6/l80s7oFDxTdRbABD77bNFh7HeAono /QlzUEEJsO/JDg1LcKUCquZf5LPvNatlm/IpfapXrcxXgWspm/clWZjQlN9Fs83g 3sOwpaSdgCp03X9nbh1m/Wvng0gZ9r7jpKw7cf3pKwYaytjFhKkc4= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_THEBAT,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtpback.ht-systems.ru Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 04:41:51 +0400 From: Andrey Repin Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Message-ID: <669445082.20140812044151@yandex.ru> To: LMH , cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: update just ruby on offline cygwin installation In-Reply-To: <53E959CC.3010102@molconn.com> References: <53E3E248 DOT 6070301 AT molconn DOT com> <53E3E71D DOT 8090208 AT cygwin DOT com> <53E94499 DOT 2080605 AT molconn DOT com> <44850477 DOT 20140812030058 AT yandex DOT ru> <53E959CC DOT 3010102 AT molconn DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Greetings, LMH! > The problem I have is that cygwin has a tendency to remove depreciated > packages when updating. This is an older setup and there are critical > components in the build that are no longer available in more recent > cygwin packages. If this is a "critical setup", then you should have a test environment replicating your setup, to do any experimentation before deploying changes on live system. That's the basics of "critical environment" handling. > If I let cygwin just do it's thing, it will break far more that it will fix. Following your logic, we should never upgrade, and use DOS 1.0 on our machines. > Updating the entire cygwin install would mean moving to more recent versions > of multiple packages and who knows how much time, effort, and resources > would be involved in fixing all of that. Nobody know, unless someone try it. This list only providing support for current packages. We'll do our best to help you resolve any issues that might arise from upgrade, but it's unlikely anyone would see into any issues coming from obsolete installs. Sorry. > At the moment, the server does exactly what it needs to in its > current configuration, so there is little sense in wading into the > quagmire of updates when there is little or noting to be gained. Fail logic. Worse, it's presumptuous. The gain is rather obvious: better interprocess- and system compatibility. I.e., for Cygwin itself - lots of fork-related fixes for the past year. There's also many other packages, which have been fixed/upgraded for similar reasons. To the more technical of your questions: yes, largely. -- WBR, Andrey Repin (anrdaemon AT yandex DOT ru) 12.08.2014, <04:30> Sorry for my terrible english... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple