X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=default; b=m1YV+wiiWYpCt1XkYnKzQUHeZrXy+tF228HLo9GQoKG xhm/tkMthLAFaCls2Hw5Uundq/k9DtpvjCVUTigCrzUGtrc2ueydmi6d81waWmBn 2GHiIE5v0nJ2tyhFBb5S7ss+sMkTA1K9ZPYWmdgmSczDHlvNm/sgGwMPZRJLTy7Q = DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=iDxdTSq0oTHwMioRkJRxRyBR4iA=; b=lLU9OwoCgP+Ay4era uN8uVnAAZdcNVR8sDd/pqUZrOfSsDzoKNwMLlKKfjXTSKfz6OQrFErrf8oc2AK5M xdk0Q+n1QMxE3Ppra1towcg8tLxLSOMIVfWUhEQCP+gasKPMFzjutW6mB/N+MXpO b5XI3QcwT8QzEHOR67upAbkfaA= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Message-ID: <53E3DCC5.1070007@cygwin.com> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 15:08:37 -0500 From: Yaakov Selkowitz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: rpm-build issue References: <1407441665 DOT 23904 DOT 5 DOT camel AT oscar DOT engineering DOT n-able DOT com> In-Reply-To: <1407441665.23904.5.camel@oscar.engineering.n-able.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes On 2014-08-07 15:01, Matt Rose wrote: > I've noticed that the newer version of the rpm-build package (4.11-1) > has a really severe bug in that it ignores the %defattr flag in the % > files section of .spec files Note that a default %defattr is provided since rpm-4.4, and therefore most uses of it are considered obsolete in Fedora: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/77 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions That being said, I haven't tried this on Cygwin. But do you actually have a root user (e.g. by renaming Administrator in /etc/passwd)? Yaakov -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple