X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:in-reply-to; q=dns; s=default; b=WT1NAxY0QKXgQk5Eq+XQsxOdEonZjP
	ycPlDJF+KTNqzoJNvJGRuYwuuZjFrIZeMcYSJyU5MaZsn0qPWJKglgPZPjx8EeVB
	Vs6SGZTMRLUQyk3HWauGsYJzKS3juf5gke3ZKRcSdIGyU/xKcbaxYxRooJ3/wzSd
	+rmXAMZnjgLpI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
	:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=WAP6qE40L1mrr3j4nDKwlMATVBQ=; b=yOU7
	/m+VN7Xd3yzjaQr1s8Y06nkRMKlutNXAAy/P8ZlNqk5/+xA+KlmQd3SUkRrxLyYZ
	U09JWuwX2sEcM5of6XtXc4hGdn9L+0djqcLIFuKQ7kF4hLu9RWxWk+37XAlkfQhO
	01EXB0HvLADUbBeDDLfFQIgn1di7m+wzCcCy1bg=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FSL_HELO_BARE_IP_2,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: plane.gmane.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: Andrew DeFaria <Andrew AT DeFaria DOT com>
Subject: Re: Simplify AD integration?
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 10:16:14 -0700
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <lrgi0u$ui7$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <20140730134716 DOT GM25860 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <53DA441F DOT 2260CAE7 AT boland DOT nl> <53DA4FE0 DOT 4020307 AT redhat DOT com> <53DA6326 DOT 7C5690BB AT boland DOT nl> <1673544354 DOT 20140801021235 AT yandex DOT ru> <53DB8805 DOT 248826F6 AT boland DOT nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
In-Reply-To: <53DB8805.248826F6@boland.nl>
X-IsSubscribed: yes

On 8/1/2014 5:28 AM, D. Boland wrote:
> Andrey Repin wrote:
>>
>> Greetings, D. Boland!
>>
>>> I am not only a man of legacy, but also a very opinionated one. So give me some
>>> slack when I say: the whole thing is insane. This would mean that from now on, I
>>> have to use constructs like ~+daniel ~+SYSTEM in a Linux shell?? Bizarre.
>>
>> No, you don't have. Default domain users are unprefixed, and the chance you
>> would use internal accounts for something like shell access is exactly zero.
>>
>> For the god's sake, read the thread before posting into it. Everything has
>> been discussed no more than two days ago.
>
> Yes, yes, I know. I wanted to react from the heart, without the intellectual baggage
> of knowing the technical intricacies behind the problem.
>
> D.

Yes, who wants the facts to get in the way of a good emotion! ;-)
-- 
Andrew DeFaria
http://defaria.com


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple