X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= default; b=Hh9SukF/kSCXIMe68JZykSel1YgjtRSO7hi+7JUmgOe0Z9dTClX1M Nqi8X1k08rMCLrtwK3XYgy0tTySFVFjm/XSpEL3ox2X31m5JvAWKS1P/zUgQ4glc Mw6X2GtuaL3w8zTir9IxQ8eXIoerlAFWPz1rOl+CxAAulMqBt4+dAI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default; bh=7cY2BXN/2b/JcFJqfMyxbai6H6w=; b=VeIm5X00L465glS+/RtfKP8F5Vo6 GiONbwFx0Zwc8ccJCooQqnjWOJ8cZIOwqKYyWDi0yEmcaDL5rgxhqeylqDb5Wl8L nJaQ7MLidGozFwUPkZ72iWIe/OKYMU7m/eW76oQQC28pB1rqAXGV2/RBOututCdp kzRCR8WZ/TuUn7Y= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: plane.gmane.org To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com From: "D. Boland" Subject: Re: Simplify AD integration? Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 17:39:18 +0200 Lines: 44 Message-ID: <53DA6326.7C5690BB@boland.nl> References: <20140730134716 DOT GM25860 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <53DA441F DOT 2260CAE7 AT boland DOT nl> <53DA4FE0 DOT 4020307 AT redhat DOT com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Eric Blake wrote: > > On 07/31/2014 07:26 AM, D. Boland wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> So I'd like to ask a few questions to which I'd like to have some brief > >> answers, kind of like a poll, to get a better idea how we should > >> proceed: > >> > >> 1. Shall we remove the leading '+' from the builtin account names > >> or shall we keep it? > >> > >> 2. Shall we stick to '+' as the separator char or choose another one? > >> If so, which one? > >> > >> 3. Shall we keep the `db_prefix' variability or choose one of > >> the prefixing methods and stick to it? If so, which one, auto, > >> primary, or always? > > > > I'm a legacy man. So I would say keep the MS symbol and use it like this \daniel, > > \SYSTEM, etc. > > But you'd have to write that as '\daniel' or \\daniel in the shell, and > you also cripple tilde expansion. That's why we already ruled out :, \, > and / as non-starters, as mentioned elsewhere in this thread. I am not only a man of legacy, but also a very opinionated one. So give me some slack when I say: the whole thing is insane. This would mean that from now on, I have to use constructs like ~+daniel ~+SYSTEM in a Linux shell?? Bizarre. On the other hand, for the sake of progress, but keeping legacy there would be only one acceptable solution: use the tilde symbol. A user could then be referred to as: ~daniel. This already works in the shell and it is also done by the Apache webserver. If I want to go my personal web space I can type: http://localhost/~daniel/ Come to think of it: IMAP does this too! I have been coding for an IMAP project, and if you want to fetch somebody's mail, you'd have to use ~corinna to display the contents of her INBOX. Cheers, Daniel -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple