X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=
	default; b=xv+NB5s5qmbN1vd2izBlHu9G5LUfiz8bqlt8W6GZJ+1xkucv9H8Wj
	NmN7QXRgcdZaS2up6IXwSGxa2uhSljwJDP5oEFVqzAhTOmbjxct7E/RmBtsYdzn0
	YyjBSZYao1H/9820Exm6ZENIeEkMPYEOg1KbCJZw7c+DKnG2auI3so=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id
	:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post
	:list-help:sender:to:from:subject:date:message-id:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=default;
	 bh=ItY1niZfOEiuzZcvvOGUuRgMnQ4=; b=jbYcrZbB9bmgsnwjuLKneXO0yOpA
	8faUytVRZDJlq2zLpdziaF4qWe+pQVdmUnJkltf7ZgB5DFuBMZxYH3zDgQW/X6HD
	4JaKr+FVIvLaKG2uar77sbh2Bu+TQo9JA9G5klTPOprJVaba8g3zASoJ5ZolKpM1
	B91Hsy0Z8C/JS18=
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Id: <cygwin.cygwin.com>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: plane.gmane.org
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "D. Boland" <daniel AT boland DOT nl>
Subject: Re: Simplify AD integration?
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 15:26:55 +0200
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <53DA441F.2260CAE7@boland.nl>
References: <20140730134716 DOT GM25860 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> So I'd like to ask a few questions to which I'd like to have some brief
> answers, kind of like a poll, to get a better idea how we should
> proceed:
> 
> 1. Shall we remove the leading '+' from the builtin account names
>    or shall we keep it?
> 
> 2. Shall we stick to '+' as the separator char or choose another one?
>    If so, which one?
> 
> 3. Shall we keep the `db_prefix' variability or choose one of
>    the prefixing methods and stick to it?  If so, which one, auto,
>    primary, or always?

I'm a legacy man. So I would say keep the MS symbol and use it like this \daniel,
\SYSTEM, etc.

> 
> Bonus question:
> 
> 4. Should Cygwin downcase all usernames when generating the Cygwin
>    username, so, if your Windows username is 'Ralph', your Cygwin
>    username will be 'ralph'?
> 

When in the Cywin domain, do like Cygwin. So, downcasing.

Cheers,
Daniel


--
Problem reports:       http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple