X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=x6GAC qv0qGjT15o7dizn14nDd25vybJPUox6w60aScXxHkHPSNFz1YYMATQkTrbSPLp7t DsCth20ViXjk6aES2rqXaDFEA6svB1AFPzPVwG460zq1CosXXA9UnsIfz8TSiT0n hS5zCqkHi7wkUvPnLTwIrf7fAKhsEaalQGgsBk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=oWlurTEGrF6 iVtg1VZMEkSJiibc=; b=Zr098+2jdFwx86XeATgZfBnRj/yyNvOJ2Nqz5V11FWd oWqHULQnPo+hfc/bJkvyH1qIO+Vy3KItrE98RQ9hfWitCeQkWLhF3sya00uKq7rI xrX7/a1L6IM2xowwlkc8gjiSACY/QRYDiEq69wXlIvEXm5VQ1n2dwtK8Ot750Sa0 = Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-in-10.arcor-online.net X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mail-in-14.arcor-online.net D2B999BE21 From: Achim Gratz To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Simplify AD integration? References: <20140730134716 DOT GM25860 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <53D93510 DOT 6020903 AT redhat DOT com> Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 21:37:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <53D93510.6020903@redhat.com> (Eric Blake's message of "Wed, 30 Jul 2014 12:10:24 -0600") Message-ID: <87ha1yk598.fsf@Rainer.invalid> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Eric Blake writes: >> 2. Shall we stick to '+' as the separator char or choose another one? >> If so, which one? > > Keeping + as mid-name separator is still best in my mind (Certainly > better than ':', '\\', or '/', and there aren't many other characters > besides ',' or '%' that would survive use through shell tilde-expansion > while still being unlikely in the middle of a user name). Mid-string is > different than leading +. The set of usable characters also includes '=' I suppose (plus '@' as has been mentioned elsewhere in the thread). They'd both work as leading character for local accounts I'd think. Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+ SD adaptation for Waldorf rackAttack V1.04R1: http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple