X-Recipient: archive-cygwin AT delorie DOT com DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; q=dns; s= default; b=fHj8yRG4DDGlzB/0p3/YUjY9ahHkp/Alv7ndk7Y1V1TmIpmbhR7O4 UBYh2KipZBo40C6xYK77UMSWfiT3ZoIXVTRkXvr+FVV2PS8lVkqx/U8X5gyaodRj PwH43dBiY4vnr4nF6FR5MC1El2B0gy5LJlpY4w0UBWJF2wRhp+X6SE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sourceware.org; h=list-id :list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-archive:list-post :list-help:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=default; bh=FjTAprnFSLgiNoyqd5HKJfnJowo=; b=G9boM/alGOXECT2jFUFS/rzEG5LF Pj7ZHN5QnojhlJtM9q9rXT9f3dSfCQ37PpNeUvU86S//QpwncGEB6/eZ9L/NI/rt gTru1XXYa3EFdmhC9VVxh1V70sCOIOJw5lA1ptpQNbzTR+APQsAurbkWaXQKpl88 vjGLGxGhPeAR4mw= Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: calimero.vinschen.de Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 21:31:59 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Subject: Re: Simplify AD integration? Message-ID: <20140730193159.GW25860@calimero.vinschen.de> Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com References: <20140730134716 DOT GM25860 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <20140730184009 DOT GS25860 AT calimero DOT vinschen DOT de> <53D942F6 DOT 10402 AT redhat DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bAwSoJxbKYwy34Oe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) --bAwSoJxbKYwy34Oe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Jul 30 19:23, Stephan Mueller wrote: > Eric Blake writes: > " How bad would it be to treat the window's DOMAIN\user as cygwin > " user AT DOMAIN? Yes, it means string-splicing to rearrange strings when > " converting between the two forms, rather than just single-character > " replacement, but it might work. >=20 > Sounds reasonable to me. Consider also that modern(*) Windows > recognizes (prefers?) user AT domain as equivalent to domain\user in > places. No, no! It's not the same. I just wrote about that in my reply to Eric. It's FLATDOMAIN\user vs. user AT dnsdomain These are different strings referring to the same domain. Corinna --=20 Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat --bAwSoJxbKYwy34Oe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT2UgvAAoJEPU2Bp2uRE+gpvYQAIvXzt3em+OkNm3QIeFEnHyM 3qAzR+oVStw7qOrbST6b44uK1C08hhVba/vNfvisONM56T8zRjH8cGUOzkMDfQIV CPAd8C/HC1b6/Du6gi0X0s6+HOsLgdAwzqsoXNdFtJRnZ9ia7UlTgo+jVTA6hmUD HvKzJpV7W6cUNHpEDu/Q4ZZK8drgJD59WeCQK6JUATwFZigYJ6xE726Zo/F9QVbh tJy+SBfawQ+wd15KxrXvsy7/Eh1fSd/h1Z1t2SU3B3cXT/84BGKLVXcjwgOhYR4z HSmVx5d+tDLu3pVQLdh8OYI+ljI0Yb7hItKKmA6s/JZQY9a+G31Y8gDgEgPXaS4r jENQHaElT1pFvGBDq5elVjzHjpzRd2PUKLAXffqdxxz6fPhyOmkr4qTsogtGKO7g gXrPBJ2e1WQUa6NngTkvHtbVxwfUJm19a/PS3BIj7LXyq6KHCD9W8eQDRhk3aKS6 wyt+7AEilthlWgkJPUPK12PA1I99ze3zo7kp/RW19HhQ97kQDXttSRhqiJboYqsU MhWXCG6XXK/w72m1+GZTtUXgw9YA2pNnuncvF2ibC4hUanKRuwkTkAOQg0OI0VgN E6FAQOUwXeEix7SYQhYg+kYxo+SDnVbDhzTuBc/rEgf54kylo4rwg42EzYYK86hs Cgs25JT0SAvFc8dON+lr =5/19 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bAwSoJxbKYwy34Oe--